People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Rash people who make decisions based on emotion rather than from enough musings are the subject of our recommendation here. Poor decision makers are the people whose decisions can't make the intended outcome. People who make decision on emotion rather than careful thinking are in my opinion poor decision makers for the below three reasons.
Firstly, when someone act on their whims, they hardly weigh the pros and cons, rather just precipitously makes a decision without spending enough time on it. Now on one hand a matter which has been given enough time to verify its possible outcomes and reached to the ultimate decision and on the other hand, same matter without thinking has been made to the decision, which one is more competent to satisfy its outcome? Definitely the first one. As in case of the latter one, the result will totally be on fate, it can produce the result or not. But to some extent results from the first case is almost certain as they are premeditated.
Secondly, does justification after a decision has been made has any impact on the decision? In most cases, the answer would be no. As because in most cases we won't have the affordability to alter the already made decision. Once a decision has been made whether the decision is justified or not, we have to bear the consequence as it is. So definitely people who make justification after taking decision are poor decision maker.
Thirdly, are justifying decisions after making them a process of acceptance or actual justification? They are actually a process of acceptance. Let us think about the scenario: I have made this decision and some kind of result has been produced, now whether I like it or not I would have to bear with it, so I would try to stay guilt free which will make me engendering supports for my decision. This cannot be a process of justification.
From the answers of the above-mentioned questions, we can see why the rash people are poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 83
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n makers are the people whose decisions cant make the intended outcome. People who m...
^^^^
Line 2, column 23, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'acts'.
Suggestion: acts
... three reasons. Firstly, when someone act on their whims, they hardly weigh the p...
^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... In most cases, the answer would be no. As because in most cases we wont have the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, kind of, in most cases, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79056047198 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67604142201 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513274336283 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.1729219373 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448584500777 0.243740707755 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157087745222 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166574799218 0.0758088955206 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267421942473 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170222843199 0.0667264976115 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.