People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Humans by nature are emotional creatures. We love to bring feelings in each and every aspect of our life. When a comparison is made between a person who makes decision based on emotion rather than reason, we often notice that reason wins the game. I strongly agree to the prompt that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify it later with superficial logic are poor decision makers for two reasons.
First and foremost, when a person makes decision based on emotion he lets his feelings collude with the sound judgement that the mind is capable of. Personal feelings are nothing more than subjective opinions which, being highly biased, can lead to egregious blunders on the part of decision maker. For instance, in 1980 the Indian national cricket team was finalized for the world cup tournament. There was an experienced player in the team (not to take his name) who was not in good form but as he had experience, the selection committee was biased towards him and selected him inspite of his subpar performance. The result was, as expected, he performed poorly in every match played. Fortunately the captain of the team was able to handle the situation with tact, which culminated in India winning the world cup. This shows that the selection committee failed as a decision maker by getting wafted with emotion(bias) and was still trying to argue logically that the player's experience was the sole reason they selected him.
Consequently it becomes clear that the logic must be a precursor of decision rather than its reverse. Often it is seen that when faced with any situation, a person is likely to react with emotion in the first place. But it becomes imperative that she should cast aside the emotion for a while and think logical approaches to the problem. With intellectual prowess is used instead of emotions, it will result in much better outcomes and less blunders. Mr. Ratan Tata is a great industrialist who believes that an argument is sound only which is suggested with reason. He gave his office not to someone who follows from his lineage but to someone who is capable enough to handle a vast empire as his. If he had let emotions take the better of him, he might have miserably failed as a founder of organization. Hence, it is quite clear that logic is the foremost parameter while taking a decision.
However, people might argue that without emotions humans will become robots and will disregard feelings in face of predilection. Here the most important thing to note is that person must adhere to his feelings while make personal choices in his life but doing the same while making other decisions will prove detrimental at best. He is the sole judge for his actions and must not mix his feelings with what is logically right.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 54
- Claim An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action Reason When assessing the morality of an action the results of the action are more important than the inte 54
- I strongly disagree with the given statement Even though I agree that University experience is much more important than the univerity education however it should not undermine student s freedom to choose the location of study When a person is forced to st 16
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 920, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r by getting wafted with emotionbias and was still trying to argue logically that...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...s the sole reason they selected him. Consequently it becomes clear that the logic must be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun blunders is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...will result in much better outcomes and less blunders. Mr. Ratan Tata is a great ind...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, still, while, for instance, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81722689076 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49554631187 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5707840547 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.227272727 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344558541043 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100683503087 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127610714107 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24350389456 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135448610483 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.