People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
There has been a long standing debate on the subject "People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers". It is very hard to categorically state the part with the highest supporters. A number of people believe this statement and a number of people also consider it false or questionable. It is important to make some query out of this statement and judge from there if it is actually a valid statement.
Firstly, worthy of note is the fact that decision making falls into diverse context. And this already clarifies that what is applicable sometimes might not be applicable other times. People make decision based on their culture, religion, environment, personality, Love etc. Considering the premise of the recommendation, humans are naturally emotional beings. Therefore we have the tendencies to be led by our emotions. Those who have outgrown this have consciously learnt it and it is still questionable to say that their every decision is made logically. And some of these decisions would have been made the other way if thought through. For instance, the man who caught is wife with another man and got the other man stabbed wasn't thinking of the consequences when he did that. His justification will be that the other man trespassed. No matter how we see it, that was a bad decision. The question here is, are "People" humans? If it's affirmative, then the recommendation is true.
Also, given the world we Live in, humans can be religious. There are diverse authorities that people acknowledge as their god. Christians for instance, believe in an unseen God, receive salvation by faith. Which implies accepting without a physical evidence. This is purely emotional. However, they go about justifying it with logics drawn from the scriptures and other teachings. And this goes beyond Christians. The question here is, will people make decision on religion or who to follow? If they will, hence, the recommendation is true.
Following the already established points, we can infer that humans tend to make a lot of emotional decisions. Some mothers give their children more than the prescribed doses of drugs, they justify it by saying they want quick recovery. This, we know can be deleterious, and this is just one out of many ways people make decisions emotional and justify it with logic. The possible complications that can come from overdose and the likes will establish the fact that these people are poor decision-makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... humans are naturally emotional beings. Therefore we have the tendencies to be led by our...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...other man and got the other man stabbed wasnt thinking of the consequences when he di...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...unseen God, receive salvation by faith. Which implies accepting without a physical ev...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13559322034 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97761170427 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549636803874 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4808356184 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.1379310345 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2413793103 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1724137931 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433633131225 0.243740707755 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927168250574 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1497842815 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286870766558 0.150359130593 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121432759427 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.