People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

The author claims that those who people who take decisions based on emotion at the instant and then go on to justify their decisions taken through emotions with logic are poor decision makers. I completely agree with the author in this standpoint.

Decisions taken by humans can be classified as two types: decision taken through emotion and decision taken through logic and conviction. In my opinion logic and emotion are two opposite ends of a spectrum. Anything done through logic may not make perfect sense when viewed through emotion and vice-versa.

First, let us look at decisions taken through emotion. Emotions generally cloud our brain of what is morally right and wrong. It only considers what is right and wrong in the eyes of the decision-maker. When taking important decisions, taking decisions through emotion will lead to more problems and may not lead to a solution. Let us consider a person who is a judge in a court. If in any case, the judge were to take a decision based on his emotion, the repercussions may even be fatal to one party. If the judge were take a decision based on emotion and later on justifies it with logic, it will not be what is expected from a judge in a court of law and makes him a bad judge and hence a bad decision-maker.

On the other hand, if the judge were to take a decision through logic and conviction, considering all facts and stakeholders involved, a morally right decision will be taken and the guilty will be punished and justice will prevail. Emotion comes from the heart and anything that comes from the heart will not consider what will happen next but rather instantaneous. But any decision taken through logic comes from thought and previous experiences and considers the future of this decision and hence a right decision will be taken. However the decision that is taken through logic may not be an acceptable decision for the decision-maker, but rather a just decision. The same example of the judge can be taken here where the judge may not like the decision he is taking but he has to take this decision for justice to prevail.

So we can conclude by saying that any decision should not be taken through emotion and later justified through logic, but rather it should be taken through logic for a morally right decision and making the decision-maker a good decision maker.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-03 Aishwarya01 50 view
2023-10-09 Truss 50 view
2023-10-04 Adesina Boluwatito 50 view
2023-10-01 shamika@25 50 view
2023-09-14 RIYA MODI 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user vishva24 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 822, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ven be fatal to one party. If the judge were take a decision based on emotion and la...
^^^^
Line 3, column 827, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...e fatal to one party. If the judge were take a decision based on emotion and later o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1550, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d hence a right decision will be taken. However the decision that is taken through logi...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, look, may, so, then, as to, in any case, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 11.1786427146 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 2260.96107784 86% => OK
No of words: 408.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74509803922 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62681072094 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.399509803922 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8113288745 57.8364921388 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.70786347227 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487119508001 0.218282227539 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188241811906 0.0743258471296 253% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147725147936 0.0701772020484 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.433286107576 0.128457276422 337% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774963145953 0.0628817314937 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.5979740519 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.