People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In every country, as they grow older, people develop different views and attitudes. In some cases, this process occurs at the societal level to the extent that characterizes the overall society as such. On the other hand, some argue that individuals often shape their worldview in close touch with their local cultures. This is clearly a controversial and subjective topic in nature, but a careful analysis of the recent public narrative on gun control as well as gay marriage in the US lends credence to the view that is consistent with the presented statement.
First, if we review the case of heated debate on gun control in the US, it becomes evident that people’s attitudes on this issue are largely influenced by their immediate surroundings. In the wake of numerous gun-related incidents, ranging from accidental shootings by infants to malicious attempts to mass-murder, the country has been divided on whether to tighten its gun regulations and to what extent it should do so. It is typical that conservatives in the South who have grown up in an environment where guns are part of their lives, in the form of, say, hunting, argue that it is not the guns but the people that kill. In contrast, individuals who have been negatively affected by the dangerous nature of guns or who were raised in a culture that perceives guns as pure weapons often make a case that the more guns, the more potential violence by showing its correlation. As this issue clearly reveals, immediate surroundings such as local culture and upbringing often shape the ways in which people view certain cases.
Similarly, the case of gay marriage also exemplifies the ways in which immediate social climate is often the determinant for people’s attitudes. As with the public discourse on gun control, gay marriage was one of the nation-wide controversies in the US before the Supreme Court finally decided to legalize it at the federal level. On one side of the equation, liberals in the Northeast states and West Coast who tend to hold the view that every citizen should be entitled for marriage shaped this stance as a result of numerous area-specific factors such as their own education, their friends’ family structure, and their families’ secular views. On the other hand, in light of those in the South who were opposed to gay marriage, it is evident that their view was also formed by community-level cultures such as Christian ideologies prevalent in the South. The nature of this controversy for which opinions significantly vary from state to state reveals that attitudes are shaped at the local level rather than the societal level.
Yet, while the cases above clearly show how people’s attitudes are influenced by their immediate conditions, we cannot go as far to conclusively argue that there does not exist society-level culture. For instance, rated as one of the most collective societies, Japan values and reinforces the idea that social cohesion is what makes the country successful. Anthropologists have constantly characterized the emphasis on uniformity as the country’s overall culture in contrast to individualism more prevalent in Western countries. As this example demonstrates, it is no doubt that there are larger society-level cultures that influence people’s attitudes. Despite this, as a caveat, it would be wise to note the risk of assuming that every citizen in a society holds the same value system.
In summary, while there are numerous arguments to be made for both sides, the aforementioned cases of gun control and gay marriage in the US support the view that people’s attitudes are determined by their immediate situation and surroundings. Although there are certain exceptions to this case, it is nonetheless important to note that there is often variation within cultures that shape the individuals’ worldview.
- The following appeared in a memo from the president of Bower Builders a company that constructs new homes A nationwide survey reveals that the two most desired home features are a large family room and a large well appointed kitchen A number of homes in o 87
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 81
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to 54
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 70
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 62
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'nonetheless', 'similarly', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'in summary', 'no doubt', 'such as', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'in contrast to', 'in some cases', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253146853147 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.128671328671 0.157235817809 82% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0993006993007 0.0880659088768 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.041958041958 0.0497285424764 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0335664335664 0.0444667217837 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.146853146853 0.12292977631 119% => OK
Participles: 0.027972027972 0.0406280797675 69% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04965532141 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0223776223776 0.030933414821 72% => OK
Particles: 0.0013986013986 0.0016655270985 84% => OK
Determiners: 0.103496503497 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00559440559441 0.0249443105267 22% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.027972027972 0.0148568991511 188% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3884.0 2732.02544248 142% => OK
No of words: 627.0 452.878318584 138% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19457735247 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00399520894 4.58838876751 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357256778309 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.290271132376 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210526315789 0.200843997647 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.157894736842 0.132149295362 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04965532141 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 298.0 219.290929204 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475279106858 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 58.9333117708 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 29.8571428571 23.380412469 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4407203181 59.4972553346 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.952380952 141.124799967 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 23.380412469 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.952380952381 0.674092028746 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.21349557522 0% => OK
Readability: 58.8842560948 51.4728631049 114% => OK
Elegance: 2.09589041096 1.64882698954 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421141661887 0.391690518653 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127171889939 0.123202303941 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0664078775755 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.583600437358 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11657285203 0.149214159877 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19198282673 0.161403998019 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058726500312 0.0892212321368 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.529678731252 0.385218514788 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0456663214947 0.0692045440612 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.313429133329 0.275328986314 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238431941261 0.0653680567796 36% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.