Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
People those who join the politics have their own ideals and goals, and they want to implement their goals in society and that is why they are in politics. However, the prompt suggests that the politicians should seek for the common ground and warranted consensus rather than those ideals. In my opinion, I mostly agree with this prompt and agrue that politicians should go for common ground rather than focusing on their own ideals, however, in some cases they should pursue their goal and ideals to promote their own agendas. I will try to clear up my position by the following three reasons.
First of all, If the politians get the power to run a country, they may have the opportunity to ignore the views of the opposition party and to implement their own agendas and ideals. This should not be done by the politicians to achieve their own interests, because these motives may lead to a dictatorship in the country which will be a sordid condition for any democratic country. For example, Hitler, in Germany, tried to established his own ideals and goals, which led to the holocaust for the jews community and decimated the communal integrity in the society. Therefore, even if the politicians have the option to pursue their own ideals they should not do that.
Secondly, it is not always possible to establish the ideals of politicians forcefully, ignoring the common ground, even for the betterment of their own party. For instance, consider a hypothetical situation where a communist party might represent the views of millions of people in a country but if they don’t have the majority in the government they cann’t establish their own goals and ideals. In that case, they should grab the common ground with the government party where at least they can have some options to implement their own ideals, though it might have in little amount.
However, I do concede that, in some cases, the politicians should hold their own ideals and belief as well as goals for which they were committed to their voters during the election time. For example, voters elect their candidate those have the common goals and ideals with their ( voters) goals and ideals. Now if the politicians don’t establish their commited ideals rather they seek the common gorund with the opposition party, this may dissapoint their voters and portrait their ( potilicians ) betrayals to their voters.
To sum up, of course, it is true that the politicians should hold their ideals and goals to establish their own agenda, however, in most of the cases they should grab the common ground for the betterment of society and democracy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 | GRACE_047 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | _ashmita.upadhyay_ | 66 | view |
| 2022-03-09 | sunshaowei | 83 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | ksmehrab | 66 | view |
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev 54
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 66
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In dev 54
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y may have the opportunity to ignore the views of the opposition party and to imp...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e common ground, even for the betterment of their own party. For instance, consid...
^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the common goals and ideals with their voters goals and ideals. Now if the poli...
^^
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssapoint their voters and portrait their potilicians betrayals to their voters. ...
^^
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r voters and portrait their potilicians betrayals to their voters. To sum up...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, at least, for example, for instance, of course, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, in some cases, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9433106576 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49662232426 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412698412698 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4272079819 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9333333333 5.21951772744 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159799007279 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820360711989 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537611793462 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116948033593 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308642406315 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y may have the opportunity to ignore the views of the opposition party and to imp...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e common ground, even for the betterment of their own party. For instance, consid...
^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the common goals and ideals with their voters goals and ideals. Now if the poli...
^^
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssapoint their voters and portrait their potilicians betrayals to their voters. ...
^^
Line 7, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r voters and portrait their potilicians betrayals to their voters. To sum up...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, at least, for example, for instance, of course, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, in some cases, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9433106576 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49662232426 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412698412698 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4272079819 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.333333333 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9333333333 5.21951772744 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159799007279 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820360711989 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537611793462 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116948033593 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308642406315 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.