Any society is perceived great only upon its progress in domains of science, technology, medicine, agriculture etc. Progress of any society is a direct outcome of its ability to embrace reasonable unconventional opinions over traditional thoughts in favor of achieving greatness. Braking barriers of economics and cultures all together setting new ones.
It is evident from history whenever man has crawled out of his comfort zones of ideologies for his quest to question more, new theories have sprung up into the realms of reality. Be, it Galileo with his concepts of solar system. Newton with his laws of motion and gravity, and Einstein with his theory of relativity each time the unknown was challenged and triumphed over. Their contributions not only were significant of their times but also are relevant to modern times as the society would have drastically been backwards was it not for them.
Another, non-trivial thought that is often overlooked is that all technologies have a limit to their development beyond which they cannot be improved and a new almost phantasmagorical method must be devised to keep progressing in a particular sphere. Computing is a field that demonstrates this phenomenon aptly from the initial days of vacuum tubes to the modern times of semi-conductor technology to the upcoming days of quantum computing and portable supercomputers each time progress was marked by acceptance of the unconventional.
Contrastingly, defendants do not fail to present the arguments of traditional methods and setups being economical and research being costly and not guaranteed to produce expected result. Moreover, the cost can at times be not justified with current scenarios of economic and social restraints. However, it is interesting to note that these conditions have been the most conducive to the most significant breakthrough in science. EV’s being slow and impractical with their ranges since their inception are now becoming the go to vehicle for the new world with Tesla leading the change.
Progress has stemmed from the unconventional and will continue to emerge from the same each time a technology hits its limit or a man wills to question more. From, the times when Newton led the change to Einstein and in modern times with Elon musk man will continue to challenge the unknown. Naysayer’s to progress will always remain sidelined post the success of any new unorthodox method. However, comfortable one may find the orthodoxy ultimate change will always be led by the unprecedented new thoughts.
- Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your 83
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 83
- Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Others believe that universities should not force students to take any courses other than those that will help pr 83
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 66
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cultures all together setting new ones. It is evident from history whenever man ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...y would have drastically been backwards was it not for them. Another, non-trivi...
^^^
Line 7, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ignificant breakthrough in science. EV’s being slow and impractical with their ra...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2962962963 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00833977722 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4834544166 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.176470588 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8235294118 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76470588235 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116177229771 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406489427417 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324934250358 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683534402878 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275832679272 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.