Most universities make it necessary for their students to take on classes not belonging to their major. This prompt suggests that this should be mandated for all universities forcing students to explore various fields other than the one they have chosen to study. I mostly agree with this recommendation and argue that students should be exposed to a variety of subjects at their college for two reasons.
To begin, with every field advancing rapidly over the years, interdisciplinary knowledge could help professionals make new breakthroughs in their area of expertise. For instance, until the 2000s trading in the stock market was mostly done through analyzing companies profits and losses and their stock price. With the development of programming and computational power, people have started using coding to predict the future prices of a stock and trade accordingly. If students majoring in finance were not exposed to various math and programming concepts then the field of quantitative finance would have never been born. It is important for students to have a general idea of other fields of study so that they understand their scope and can determine if they could be used in their work.
Further, it is necessary for all universities to make students take up courses in humanities and social science, even if they are not relevant to their major. For instance, it is important for an artificial intelligence student to take up classes on ethics and learn about racism and discrimination, as it is important that the programs they write should not learn to be racist or discriminatory. Courses on the environment and human values help students realize more about the current world which may not be that important in their field of study but essential to become better human beings.
One may argue that people that have already done their undergraduate need not take up courses outside their major when they are pursuing their postgraduate degree as they would have already taken up those courses before, which seems fair if put into perspective. That’s why this would be complex to answer and universities could mandate other field courses based on their level of study. The university's job is to not only make students professionals in their major but also better human beings and visionaries for the future.
- People should undertake risky actions only after they have carefully considered its consequences Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerat 65
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaint 73
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: STOCK_AND_TRADE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stock in trade'?
Suggestion: stock in trade
...oding to predict the future prices of a stock and trade accordingly. If students majoring in fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, may, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14736842105 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82852016358 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4840608595 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.714285714 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311440581491 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127727487046 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744069512644 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214078900153 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398087767496 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: STOCK_AND_TRADE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stock in trade'?
Suggestion: stock in trade
...oding to predict the future prices of a stock and trade accordingly. If students majoring in fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, may, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14736842105 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82852016358 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4840608595 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.714285714 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311440581491 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127727487046 0.0831039109588 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744069512644 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214078900153 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398087767496 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.