Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals are the inevitable part of any society. Basically, scandals are unethical actions which are not accepted by the people of the society. I completely agree with the claim that the Scandals are useful in order to focus our attention on the problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals allows to get more attention from the people and hence put pressure on the authorities to investigate the issue and punish the guilty. For example, in India it came to light that many businessmen left the country by taking huge loans from the banks and failed to repay the loans. As this issue was brought to focus, the government changed the rules and made laws more strict so that in the future this event will not occur again.
Speaker or reformer could have brought the issue forward but the speaker or the reformer can reach only a few people within a limited area. But Scandals are spread like wildfires and hence reach maximum people forcing the authorities to take some effective actions against it.
However, scams may not always be true and in many cases, they are just rumors. These rumors can sometime destroy the reputation of a person and due to which person has to face many problems even if the he/she is not guilty. In some cases, false scams even lead to unrest among the people and hence the people should give a careful attention to these problems and take their stand in an intelligent manner.
This it is evitable that the scandals play a pivotal role in order to bring focus of the mass on the problems. And as scandals reach majority mass of the people it tries to expose the institution, people and hence purify the system.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities 50
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 63
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do.Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Summarize points in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
...reformer ever could. Scandals allows to get more attention from the people and henc...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 199, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
...erson has to face many problems even if the he/she is not guilty. In some cases, false...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 381, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an intelligent manner" with adverb for "intelligent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... to these problems and take their stand in an intelligent manner. This it is evitable that the scanda...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, in many cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 294.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7074829932 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30629301237 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527210884354 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.499978561 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.461538462 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297980595382 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102442187141 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161018581847 0.0758088955206 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165202828431 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155560542904 0.0667264976115 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 100.480337079 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.