Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Most of the times, scandals are the reason we get mislead while focussing on any issue.
Recently CCD founder Siddhartha died claiming that IT department of India has pressurized him even after giving all the tax money. Vijay Maliya has twitted that IT department has harassed him just like Siddhartha, and IT department is very ruthless and meaningless. In realiy, Vijay Malia is fraud who had taken huge amounts of loan and absconed to other country. Vijay Malia's interruption in this context is not all apt and also it very likely that he is trying to gain sympathy by using Siddharthas's murder. Hence, Vijay Malia's tweet is clearly misleading the public by using the death of Siddhartha. But couple of years ago, there was a case where the IT departmenr has seriously targeted innocnet people and no action taken by Government.
In my college, next week we had a planned internal exam. A group of people have created a very sentimental drama so that the Professor wold postpone the exam. And the drama was that one student is very critical and no one can concentrate on exams untill that student is conscious. Professor believed it and postponed the exam. In reality, the postpone drama is due the trip planned by those group of people. Those students in my class has cleverly mislead not only Professor but also other students. Two years ago, really there was a student admitted to hopital on serious condition due to accident. Professors had cooperated with us during that time. Hence, proper facts need to be considered before beginning to focus on issue.
Without penchantness if facts are considered candidly, there won't be any misjudegement. First of all time and energy is saved by evaluating the main facts.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
- Cities plays a major role as they represent the State to the world. So it is important that we take care of the cities. Maintaining the cities is not a free factor, so i mostly agree that financial support must be provided for them to thrive.As being a ma 50
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 33
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
- "Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. " 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 652, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...le of years ago, there was a case where the IT departmenr has seriously targeted innoc...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 340, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... it and postponed the exam. In reality, the postpone drama is due the trip planned by those ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 449, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'misled'.
Suggestion: misled
...Those students in my class has cleverly mislead not only Professor but also other stude...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, really, so, while, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94178082192 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67202964935 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582191780822 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2026233389 60.3974514979 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.1666666667 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0462257555159 0.243740707755 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0130471224406 0.0831039109588 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0186721450654 0.0758088955206 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0257672187071 0.150359130593 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165835776233 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.