Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals may be referred as events or happenings that draws an immediate attention of public and often results into some lucrative decisions. With a view of some past happening I do assert to the statement given by the author.
In the recent past we have heard about many scandals like 2G spectrum, Common wealth games, coal mine accusation relating to the incapability of the ruling government to control them. The extensive publicity of these news was a major fact that draws some extinguished decisions against the person involved. It doesn’t matter whether the culprit may be a politician or a bureaucrat rules are equal for every citizen in democracy.
From my memoir, I would like to define scandals as widespread mammoth occurrences that defames the institution involved. Their reputation are destroyed in such a way that it is quite difficult for them to wake up again in the society with the previous goodwill. If we look into the case of the Sahara group the inability of its chairman Mr. Subrat Roy leads to its share values to all time low. Whether it may be the case of chit funds or involvement of ruling ministers in those organisations all of them are either suspended or expelled from the party as a result of heavy public demand.
So definitely its a major role of media, press, paparazzi and all local whistle blowers in publicity of the scams and scandals. They may be uncertain about the result of their accusations. But raising hands against them forces the crime controlling department to take legal action against the doing of the organisations or the individual concerned.
In the crux, though there is possibility of misleading the general public through a false case of fraudrent, it is the responsibility of the reformers and the speakers to indentify the mountain out of a molehill.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 41
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 12
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...ontrol them. The extensive publicity of these news was a major fact that draws some exting...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...involved. Their reputation are destroyed in such a way that it is quite difficult...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the society with the previous goodwill. If we look into the case of the Sahara gro...
^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...of heavy public demand. So definitely its a major role of media, press, paparazzi...
^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... there is possibility of misleading the general public through a false case of fraudrent, it i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271903323263 0.240241500013 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.123867069486 0.157235817809 79% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0755287009063 0.0880659088768 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0181268882175 0.0497285424764 36% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0574018126888 0.0444667217837 129% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.154078549849 0.12292977631 125% => OK
Participles: 0.0453172205438 0.0406280797675 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8708694085 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0271903323263 0.030933414821 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00302114803625 0.0016655270985 181% => OK
Determiners: 0.141993957704 0.0997080785238 142% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151057401813 0.0249443105267 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00604229607251 0.0148568991511 41% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1822.0 2732.02544248 67% => OK
No of words: 307.0 452.878318584 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9348534202 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345276872964 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263843648208 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198697068404 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.166123778502 0.132149295362 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8708694085 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592833876221 0.48968727796 121% => OK
Word variations: 65.5497558523 55.4138127331 118% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6153846154 23.380412469 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4501300091 59.4972553346 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.153846154 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 23.380412469 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.461538461538 0.674092028746 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 49.9997494362 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 2.36363636364 1.64882698954 143% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800227416732 0.391690518653 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0799635934077 0.123202303941 65% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0499082889941 0.077325440228 65% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.607252276602 0.547984918172 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144704045233 0.149214159877 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464810491982 0.161403998019 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341864938875 0.0892212321368 38% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.412688040774 0.385218514788 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0762120123976 0.0692045440612 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597373082048 0.275328986314 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260388903186 0.0653680567796 40% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.