Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
The Indian Government faced the largest telecom scandal when the news of its awarding the 2G spectrum to private companies without legal auctions got exposed, leaving the Government vulnerable to bear the brunt of extreme criticism, from both the national and the international media.
The beleaguered Government had also illegally allocated some of the country's largest coal mines to public sectors and other private companies, which when unveiled, resulted in the resignation of several political bigwigs working in coalition with the people involved in the scam and de-allocation of several coal mines.
These are events that stir the entire nation, agitate the mass and very often lead to the no-confidence of the Government. Scandals, as we term them, exhume some of the deepest secrets of any nation, be it of the Government or at the individual level.
Scandals are widespread mammoth occurrences, publicized extensively, that defames the involved institution. They are classified broadly as political, social, educational, sports and religious scandals. They spread like wildfires, across entire nations within a short span, fuelled by the media, resulting in mass movements and criticisms.
The scandals offer ways to expose the dire problems and their consequences vehemently than it can be done through public speakers or reformers. What speakers can achieve is to agitate the mass, generally limited within certain geographical boundaries and political constraints, but scandals spread like wildfires, engulfing the entire nations in flames, charring it to dust and spewing out the dark smoke of political blasphemy. They bring to light the closely guarded, illegal activities a nation's deeply involved in, the various scams worth millions of dollars of people's money and life, and, unmasks the Satan that hides behind the 'social reformers' who are accused of the scams. They tend to focus our attention to problems that we normally, nonchalantly and blatantly avoid. The paparazzi, the media, the press, the internet and quite often the whistle-blowers too, cumulatively fuel this effort.
International scandals, involving some of the renowned personalities and organizations, such as the Olympics scandals, where eminent sports persons were found to resort to drugs, the US president having an amorous affair with a White House office staff, the Pope of the Vatican City demonized for outraging the modesty of young seminarians and fathering a child, or Wikileaks exposing the brutality the Afghan prisoners faced at the hands of the US army, call for worldwide action and demand purgation of the colloquial system. These problems cannot be sufficiently addressed by any reformer as very often they may face grave consequences from people in power that eventually subdues or threatens them. Scandals brazenly expose the nudity of the system, which cannot be veiled with the rags of lies.
News of such wrong-doings proliferates through both scandals and rumors. But what differentiates a scandal from a rumor is that the latter changes its hues and forms as it passes down through various channels whereas scandals exponentially evolve, exposing more scandals associated with the previous ones, forming a mountain out of a molehill.
But scandals are not always true. Rumors that cumulate into scandals may often become disorganized and wane away and deviate from their specific course. It may also result in uncalled violent consequences between people or nations. It is at this juncture we need a humble reformer, who would guide the agitation with profound leadership qualities, which would help the cause achieve its motive and mitigate the problems.
Scandals, thus, cannot be restrained within any specific boundary. Scandals spread their roots and secure themselves firmly to the ground only to shake the foundation of the entire setup and demand reforms. They tend to expose the institution behind the purdah, purify the system and purge out evils. In a grand and effective way, unlike any other method, it draws people's focus on issues which require immediate attention.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 16
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. 50
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 88
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 50
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...Government had also illegally allocated some of the countrys largest coal mines to public s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'countrys the largest'.
Suggestion: countrys the largest
...ad also illegally allocated some of the countrys largest coal mines to public sectors and other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 490, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...the closely guarded, illegal activities a nations deeply involved in, the various scams w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 35, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t. International scandals, involving some of the renowned personalities and organization...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'whereas', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25035161744 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.139240506329 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0928270042194 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0492264416315 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0365682137834 0.0444667217837 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106891701828 0.12292977631 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0407876230661 0.0406280797675 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82914499878 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0210970464135 0.030933414821 68% => OK
Particles: 0.0028129395218 0.0016655270985 169% => OK
Determiners: 0.119549929677 0.0997080785238 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.014064697609 0.0249443105267 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0182841068917 0.0148568991511 123% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 4109.0 2732.02544248 150% => OK
No of words: 637.0 452.878318584 141% => OK
Chars per words: 6.45054945055 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02382911018 4.58838876751 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.444270015699 0.366273622748 121% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.337519623234 0.280924506359 120% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.230769230769 0.200843997647 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156985871272 0.132149295362 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82914499878 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 353.0 219.290929204 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554160125589 0.48968727796 113% => OK
Word variations: 73.8060211996 55.4138127331 133% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 25.48 23.380412469 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 105.836129937 59.4972553346 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.36 141.124799967 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.48 23.380412469 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.32 0.674092028746 47% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.94800884956 182% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 59.2319623234 51.4728631049 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.76875 1.64882698954 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111680446376 0.391690518653 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0974567584383 0.123202303941 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0840872684836 0.077325440228 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.588716883518 0.547984918172 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.227121857523 0.149214159877 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636006876171 0.161403998019 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047960173687 0.0892212321368 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.338139124969 0.385218514788 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.111670913733 0.0692045440612 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750172119293 0.275328986314 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404669182281 0.0653680567796 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.4325221239 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 22.0 5.30420353982 415% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 16.0 3.66592920354 436% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.