Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Science and technology have been the backbone for substantial growth and development within our society. A plethora of problems -communication, banking, transportation- have been checked by the advent of science and technology. However, it would be presumptuous to state that all of society's problems would one day be eradicated by science and technology.
Firstly, there are perennial problems within society that would simply be impossible to solve with science and technology alone. Certain societies and communities have been battling with issues of racism for as long as we can remember. While institutions and organizations have developed measures in place to check this long-standing issue, science and technology may be seem hamstrung in dealing with this problem. I have been a personal victim of racism in the past and while I ponder on ways in which we can properly address this issue, science and technology do not play a significant role. It is difficult to comprehend how science and technology would stop a racist white man from using derogative terms at people of color.
Furthermore, while there are several societal problems that have been notably solved by science and technology, however, there are certain problems that are being sprung up with the use of these innovations. Social media has played a vital role in the development of our society but some specific problems have arisen due to their use. The proliferation of fake news and internet-stalking is one of the few problems that have to be addressed with the advent of social media.
While many would argue that science and technology have made life seamless by solving many problems within society, it is worthy to note there are certain societal problems that simply cannot be solved with science and technology.
In conclusion, while we may hope for innovations in science and technology to be a panacea for our issues within society, it simply is impossible for all our problems to be solved by science and technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | David Okenwa | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | najaf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hello_kratnesh101 | 33 | view |
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers 50
- Government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students 66
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Bec 58
- The following appeared in a health newsletter A ten year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whereas today that number i 60
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19571865443 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96511528438 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461773700306 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3457066165 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.692307692 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394295448704 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166928027957 0.0831039109588 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104785300296 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260987829751 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427087114753 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.