Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems
Society's problems are very broad in range. Even so, I believe that science and technology might be able to solve most of society's problems for the following two reasons.
Major conflicts in society arise emerge from individuals' need for resources. For example, consider two villages where people's primary occupation agriculture. There exists a river flows from one village to another which is the primary source of water for both the villages. Now, if the first village uses up most of the water, the second village will face serious problems due to the lack of water. This will eventually result in major conflicts between the villages. Now, let's say with the help of science and technology we created a hybrid version of the plant grown in either of the villages, which requires minimal water to survive. Now there is sufficient water for both the villages and conflicts will soon be resolved. A similar argument can be made for most of the conflicts that arise from competition for resources. The history is full of wars where the strong conquer and plunder the weak to satisfy their own needs. But now, if with the help of science we are able to cater to the needs of everyone, the to conquer itself dies.
One might argue that there are many social issues that cannot be addressed by science and technology, like gender inequality. It is true that science and technology do not directly address these problems. But science and technology have enabled us with unprecedented capability for communication, as a result increasing the outreach of the people who wish to solve these problems. Feminism is at its best today, the idea has been spread to all corners of the world and change is evidenced at a rate never seen before. Part of the success in tackling such social problems can be attributed to science and technology.
Science may not be able to all of society's problems but it surely plays the role of the catalyst in most situations. Hence, it is not far-fetched to claim that science and technology can solve all of society's problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | David Okenwa | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | najaf | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | hello_kratnesh101 | 33 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 50
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 63
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, even so, for example, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87464387464 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59577150839 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7694255361 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0526315789 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4736842105 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368826069745 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113170425923 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976189007058 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285978704566 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112988801263 0.0667264976115 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.