Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
A Utilateranian approach towards the conduction of research has long been under academic discourse. According to many, the research study is utility is tantamount to the live of the number of people it effects. The greater the vested interests in the result of a scientific reserach the greater is the incentive to execute it. This is how majority of the pharmaceuticals decide for their fund-allotment. However, whether this is the ideal premise for progress in research is a highly contentious topic.
Firsly, there is a good chance that what exists for the minority may one day trancsend to loom over the majority and thus be deletrious. This is specailly the case with diseases. They begin at a small scale and then grow to be prevailing almost everywhere. The porliferation of SARs, HIV(AIDS), Swine flu etc. fall under this category.
Secondly, it has been long known that the world is exposed to the butterfly effect. What happends in one corner of the globe could engender differenet and wide ranging phenomenon at the other end. This could be the very reason why sociologists and economists have studied what falls under microfinance. In rural India, extensive study over small savings to be cumulated for one and all through policies has been exceptionally fruitful. Hence, a small saving here, could do wonders there.
Thirdly, there are many socilogical and cultural problems that minority communities face. They are tied down by religious dogmas and can never fight over the opression they’re subjected to. The case of Female Genital Mutilation, prevalent in the minority Muslim communities may not be resolved without research that could then be staged for the world for their awareness. This is how humanity in small pockets of the world can be saved.
In conclusion, scientists must look into all fields with the ambition to bring something beneficial to the society. It is true that the financial viability is a big hinderance when it comes to catering to the wants of those who aren’t strong in number. But when given a chance to overcome it scholars must not hesitate to serve just a handful of people. Afterall, the pursuance of knowldge is all about taking small steps towards the bigger picture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | shoeb_athar | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | DH123 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Jianmo | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people. 50
- The following appeared in the memo from the Vice President of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities. "according to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year .. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
A Utilateranian approach towards the cond...
^
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y Muslim communities may not be resolved without research that could then be stag...
^^
Line 9, column 241, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: strong
...g to the wants of those who aren't strong in number. But when given a chance to overcome it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 360, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...tate to serve just a handful of people. Afterall, the pursuance of knowldge is all about...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08695652174 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83297133886 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567934782609 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8120527549 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3913043478 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105620029162 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261507902522 0.0831039109588 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392987238927 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554462000271 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542105704576 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.