As societies advance the preservation of cultural heritage becomes increasingly important even at the cost of modern development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning

Essay topics:

As societies advance, the preservation of cultural heritage becomes increasingly important, even at the cost of modern development.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of prioritizing cultural heritage over modern development and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Cultural preservation should should not have been on the table of discussion societal development through modern strategies where reconciled with individual culture and region. That we speak about this now points to the mis-application of these in our respective lives.
Modern development has achieved exceeding feets in industrakization, globalization (making the world one big village), that cannot be overemphasied. Take for example, mechanised farming, replacing man-labour. With this, the wear and tear of the body has been reduced, and agricultural cultivation and production has burgeoned to height unprecedented.
With the advent of vehicles, people no longer spend hours on the road just for moving from one plcae to another, and can channel this to structyred work and planning

Culture on the other end gives us a sens

Some culturally biased school-of-thought would argue that there is no need for considering modern development, as their people are smart enough to bridge any advancement if given the opportunity, without outside pollution, most especially when they consider the dwindling of their own cultural dos and don't being blurred. The semblance of truth here is that, indeed, due to uneven focus on just modern development, there is indeed less approbation to culture, which precedes its lost; as well as if given the opportunity, locals would advance. The glaring truth here is though there would be some form of advancement, most culture would not even know what has been attained in the world, and due to their bias, would not even apply skirt strategies, leaving them to be living anachronistically.

Others more versatile thought would agrue that primitive way of doing things leave nothing to be decided, and it would be best to completely phase out these ways, for a better developmental paths. This however, is the on of the main reasons there is a relunctance from the locals in the adoption of modern development strategy. As we have seen in the advent of 'Boko Haram', roughly means 'say no to modern education, which northern Nigeria was figting was the pervasive application of the said modern development, at the expense of their cultures, and lack of respect for their religion.
Let us also not forget the adoption strategy through which modern development was introduced to some parts of the world, colonization. The readiness of these parts to accept advancement cost them thier freedom, for most part, for more than 50 years. 5o years of subjugation is no child's play.

The way forward however should not be the adamant reluctance of both ends of the spectrum to work together: cultural preservation and modern development. Societies should strive to employ modern development where necessary, however, not hook, line and sinker. These advancement should be region and culture specific. One way of doing this is to have the locals understand the rudiments on which these advamcement was built, then apply to themselves.It will save time.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-10 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ekarumeblessin… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: should
Cultural preservation should should not have been on the table of discussio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Culture on the other end gives us a sens Some culturally biased school-of-thought...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 392, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...advent of Boko Haram, roughly means say no to modern education, which northern Nig...
^^
Line 12, column 261, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this advancement' or 'These advancements'?
Suggestion: This advancement; These advancements
...ry, however, not hook, line and sinker. These advancement should be region and culture specific. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, well, for example, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2513.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 477.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26834381551 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01235904424 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545073375262 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 108.029217013 60.3974514979 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.611111111 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166728062942 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539935501851 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396628314521 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0743508942862 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344821567768 0.0667264976115 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.