Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Talented children, if trained from an early age, can not only do wonders in their respective streams but also benefit the entire society. Therefore, a society must identify especially talented children and train them to develop their talents from an early age. Yet, such training and development must not come at the expense of neglecting other children.
Verily, providing training to talented children from early age will fetch multiple benefits for them. Foremost, every child is a unique combination of traits, qualities and aptitude as corroborated by the Gardener’s theory of multiple intelligences that classifies skill-sets of children into different categories such as word-smart, Maths-smart, sound-smart, etc. Children are very receptive and malleable at early age and if their traits and qualities are specifically nurtured from the beginning they can do miracles in their prospective professions. In fact, gaining expertise in myriad arts and sports such as music, chess, gymnasium, etc warrant early childhood training. Further, precocious children, if trained together, would drive each other by competition. This would give them an opportunity to reflect on their shortcomings and appreciate their strength. Otherwise, without competition from equally talented peers, such children are likely to develop superiority complex over other ‘mediocre’ commoners and feel alienated. Further, mentoring and engaging such prodigies through training would protect them from falling into bad company, addictions, drinking, smoking and other distractions.
Moreover, fostering of talented children for specific professions cannot be done without adequate, and often expensive, resources. For example, a music prodigy requires musical instruments; chess talents need coaching, athletes and sports aspirants require infrastructure; science students want labs; and so on. While critics claim that parents have the responsibility to develop the innate talents of their wards, not all of them have required means to facilitate such development. The onus, then, lies with the society to provide the required resources to those talents. Additionally, by investing in the precocious talents, a society also stands to benefit by guaranteeing itself with the endowment of future heroes and role-models. For instance, the pride of Argentina, Lionel Messi was coached from a tender age; and so was the case with the chess genius Bobby Fischer who brought laurels for US. Furthermore, through mentoring and training from early age, a society can also inculcate values, beliefs and desire in students for contributing to societal welfare, once they are established.
However, the proposition overlooks the instances where an exclusive training program can deprive the deserving children as well. Firstly, apart from being naturally bestowed, children can also acquire talent through hard work and efforts as exemplified by the success story of Cristiano Ronaldo and the likes. Secondly, without an appropriate and effective means of identifying special talents, even the most precocious children may get screened as the ordinaries. Thirdly, qualities of certain children appear late in their school years. For example, Einstein in early school years struggled with speech difficulties, yet went on to become a legendary Physicist. The author’s recommendation for an exclusive training would deprive all such children as well as the society from the intended and possible benefits. Therefore, any such training must be open to all students instead of the elite ones or else it would be discriminatory. Lastly, if a society is obligated to train talented children, it also has the responsibility to care for children with special learning difficulties; and, hence, it must also cater for the learning needs of such children.
In conclusion, nurturing prodigies from an early age is not only advantageous for them but also for the society in multiple ways. However, any such training program must also be accessible to the interested students who may not qualify into the society’s unreliable list of talented children. Better yet, a society must endeavour to care for the learning needs of all the children to mould them into responsible citizens of tomorrow.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
2024-07-31 | josow | 66 | view |
2024-07-27 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 70 | view |
2024-07-27 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 62 | view |
2024-04-18 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
- Claim Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system Reason Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts or minds 83
- As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. 83
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying 92
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image 83
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he learning needs of such children. In conclusion, nurturing prodigies from ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, well, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3632.0 2235.4752809 162% => OK
No of words: 641.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66614664587 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.0316973083 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00241862261 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 329.0 215.323595506 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513260530421 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 1098.0 704.065955056 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.764614166 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.24137931 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1034482759 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.24137931034 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 10.2758426966 224% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486621347765 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137158846889 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107725630233 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316456914167 0.150359130593 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814577596864 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 191.0 100.480337079 190% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.