Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training
for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing
and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the
recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples
shape your position
The prompts claim that we can usually learn much more from like-minded people whose views contradict our own because disagreement can cause tension, demotivation, and impede learning. The given topic is highly contentious because different people may have different positions and opinions on the topic. Soma may go for the topic, while others cannot argue with it at all. I am both agree and disagree with the given claim that we can usually learn much more from people whose views we can share than whose those views contradict our own. There are two reasons and example supporting my positions are presented in the following paragraphs below.
Firstly, Special knowledge is important for all people in their lives. Knowledge help students to achive their goal. For example, In United Stated of America, gives to their children proper knowledge in their childhood in their interested field. If some students get the knowledge in their particular filed, they direct focus on their field and become successful person in their life. AdditionalIy, it helps to economic development in their societies as well as this country. In effect, socieity could find those children who have special knowledge and provide to develop their skill in early ages.
However, Some students like in that fields advantageous for the country, while others field may be disadvantages for the country. For instance, If the some students like to study in atomic field like how to makes atom bombs, that is core physics. If Society suggest to learn that field in early ages, in future that students may be dangerous person of that country. Also, in early ages they have no proper knowledge, What is right or wrong?. Consequently, Society should not provide training those student who have special knowledge in that filed.
In sum/conclusion, the reasons and examples presented to support the claim that both consonant and dissonant with the topic. The essay highlights the society should identified those children who have special talents and provide training from then at an early age to develop their talents. The example of ..... illustrate to support the given topic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-18 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2024-02-13 | Tammy__kk | 79 | view |
| 2024-01-10 | luljaime | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 83 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but the general welfare of all its people 75
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development
- Some people believe that success in creative fields such as painting fiction writing and filmmaking primarily requires hard work and perseverance Others believe that such success mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned Write a response in wh 30
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ile others cannot argue with it at all. I am both agree and disagree with the giv...
^
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'who's those'?
Suggestion: who's those
...om people whose views we can share than whose those views contradict our own. There are two...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in their life. AdditionalIy, it helps to economic development in their societ...
^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ife. AdditionalIy, it helps to economic development in their societies as well a...
^^
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountry. Also, in early ages they have no proper knowledge, What is right or wron...
^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have no proper knowledge, What is right or wrong?. Consequently, Society should ...
^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'those students'?
Suggestion: this student; those students
...ly, Society should not provide training those student who have special knowledge in that file...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires base form of the verb: 'identify'.
Suggestion: identify
...The essay highlights the society should identified those children who have special talents...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20172910663 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58584128961 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507204610951 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9414770841 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.35 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254104599446 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820917725669 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106259207841 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164305421896 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869314772517 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.