Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Regarding qualities of leaders, there are two conflicting views. On the one hand, some people believe that leaders should be competitive in any field of inquiry in order to be successful. Other people take a radically different viewpoint and allege that leaders, in order to be successful, should take other opinions into consideration and cooperate with people. In what follows, first the justification of each side is delineated, later on, my personal perspective having been inspired by the rationale of each side is explicated.
To commence with, there is no doubt that leaders play a significant role in every given society and they have been created out of people's demands and do not have easy tasks to do. Broadly speaking, there are many factors that influence a leader's success in trustworthiness, being committed, and honesty, competitive and so forth. Among these qualities, some people are inclined toward the opinion that being competitive is of utmost importance because it makes a leader successful person. In fact, this hallmark could provide an opportunity for a society to make a progress day in day out owing to the fact that being highly competitive cause progress. As a vivid example, competitive make a leader work harder and with the hard-working attitude and assiduousness not only can a leader become successful but also a society can thrive and flourish. To elucidate more on this issue, being competitive is beneficial for both societies and leaders to the extent that leaders could reach the pinnacle of their jobs.
On the other hand, hardly can a society make a progress and achieve success without cooperation with others. If we take a minute to ponder over it, leaders are elected based on people's vote, so, even after election leader should make an effort to consider people's ideas. Not only can this cooperation cause comradeship and morale among people and leaders, but also can cause trustworthy throughout the society. For instance, if a leader takes people's opinion into account in every field, the trust of people will be doubled and a leader could become successful with the help of individuals. Delve further into the issue, cooperation has a mutual bond and provide fertile ground for leaders to work properly and think of prosperity and living conditions of the people.
In my opinion, leaders should carry various hallmarks in order to become successful. For example, if a leader is highly competitive without honesty, hardly can a society flourish. Indeed, all the characteristics work together properly and guarantee a leader's success. Trust, honesty, assiduousness, shrewd, diligent, competitive, committed, cooperation, empathy are significant factors that a leader should take into account if he/she wants to be successful. With carrying these features not only can a leader make a progress day in day out but also can gain enough respect and honor from human beings.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
- humans' mind is superior to the machines. do you agree or disagree? 66
- Every generation of people is different in important ways. How is your generation different from your parents' generation? 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important problems in today s world will be solved in our lifetime 85
- Some people like to do only what they do already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risks. Which do you prefer? 73
- TPO 10 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...there are many factors that influence a leaders success in trustworthiness, being commi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... work together properly and guarantee a leaders success. Trust, honesty, assiduousness,...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, broadly speaking, for example, for instance, in fact, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2502.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22338204593 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88559284478 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482254697286 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 793.8 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0950226239 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8095238095 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348690865679 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114151406525 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895989072543 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192644198776 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104321435007 0.0667264976115 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.