Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
We are living in a society where leadership is receiving more and more attention. To get things well done, governments, industries, or other fields must have successful leaders. However, opinions vary about the judgment on whether a leader is successful. In my opinion, a successful leader should be competitive enough, rather than cooperative. I hold this view for two reasons, which I will dilate on in the following essay.
First, one should be competitive first before s/he becomes a leader. A lot of people seek the opportunity for being a leader. Only by beating others can one succeed in this competition. For instance, when a bunch of people attending a job interview, the employer will only pay attention to the one who shows the most abilities. Also, after getting the job, only the one who has the highest KPI will receive the most salary and have the best chance to get promoted. Although cooperation is also an important skill in the company, following others' paces won't create any possibility of promotion. Therefore, competitiveness is the top priority for people who want to become leaders.
Second, only by acting competitively can one make others listen to him/her. Persuading others is a crucial ability for any successful leader. If a leader can't refute others' criticism, how could s/he build up the authority, make his/her subordinators follow him/her, and put his/her ideas into practice? And being able to persuade others means being competitive. Also, after being a leader, s/he will receive many doubts and disagreements from outside. If the leader wants to enlarge the team, s/he must try to refute people who disagree with him/her, and thus strengthen his/her influence. A successful leader can even enroll those who initially dislike him/her, by effectively persuading them. Therefore, competitiveness is also necessary for a team's solidarity and development.
Last but not least, cooperation is also significant. A team won't accomplish anything if it's broken apart inside. The more cooperative the teammates, the more effective the team. It's also necessary for a leader too. If the leader never works with his/her team but only gives instructions, s/he will soon be discarded by the team.
In conclusion, a successful leader must be both competitive and cooperative. But competitiveness weighs more, for it is necessary for becoming a leader and for a leader's authority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | Technoblade | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | nimagm | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | nimagm | 79 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | allang9501 | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Lucas13 | 33 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y for any successful leader If a leader cant refute others criticism how could she b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 720, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...competitiveness is also necessary for a teams solidarity and development Last but ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'not the least'.
Suggestion: not the least
... solidarity and development Last but not least cooperation is also significant A team ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s she will soon be discarded by the team In conclusion a successful leader must b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1957.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06994818653 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8777719363 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502590673575 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 386.0 23.0359550562 1676% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1957.0 118.986275619 1645% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 386.0 23.4991977007 1643% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 114.0 5.21951772744 2184% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429418862327 0.243740707755 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.429418862327 0.0831039109588 517% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260158536001 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824868238377 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 195.4 14.1392134831 1382% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -328.77 48.8420337079 -673% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 155.0 12.1743820225 1273% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.61 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.89 8.38706741573 309% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.8971910112 471% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 156.4 11.2143820225 1395% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 155.0 11.7820224719 1316% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.