Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Mankind has discovered a unique way of escaping mundane life and that is what we call arts. Over millenniums, art has burgeoned not only as a pastime but as a profession too. Many people have adopted art as a profession regardless of its financial benefits. Despite the fact that an artist strives to become a consummate artist rather making a living out of it, government should provide funding and platforms in order to disseminate arts.
Admittedly, it’s the keen interest of the audience that disseminates arts and helps it to flourish. Arts always finds a way to its audiences whether it is promoted or not, For instance, Mozart’s compositions do not require any medium or funding to flourish. A good piece of artistic work always gets public attention. However, arts sometimes get exposed to the threat of oblivion. This is because people’s interests are morphed and evolved overtime. This is where government can play its part in preserving it. Mostly, arts portrays cultural roots and traditions of a nation and government should act as a curator by means of establishing museums, libraries etc. in order to preserve it in its true essence.
It is a quite moot belief that government’s part in promoting arts tarnishes its integrity. Plausibly, government funding for arts may imply it being ostentatious. Additionally, government might get denounced or blamed for being a part of a propaganda it corroborates such an art that conveys unorthodox or unconventional views. All such opinions should be ignored and regarded as mere critics of the commendable piece of artistic work
In conclusion, arts do not require state’s support to grow and find a place in the heart of its audience. However, government should underwrite arts in terms of preserving it. Additionally, an artist produces art through his devotion for it without a concern for the benefits he might get from it. Therefore, its integrity is impregnable and no power could undermine its true nature.
- "We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, open 50
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found 90
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 16
- "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the 33
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 309, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e fact that an artist strives to become a consummate artist rather making a living out of it...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21604938272 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14544031451 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570987654321 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8355331019 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9473684211 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0526315789 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273057761937 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940925741053 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643802589528 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183269953692 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456078746009 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.