Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Art tells the story of a historical soceity, and over the time art and culture has gone through a signifincant changes by influence of different kind of peoplse and instituons. The notion states that some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people, but others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. While I partially agree with the statement, I belive that there need room for overall integrity of the art.
First of all, any government run the contry, and maintains the law and orders ot the country. In addition, they bear all expense of the government institutions and officials. In most countries, historical art are preserved by the government, and they fund for the preservation of the arts. So, the poepole of the country can see the arts easily with low cost, and can learn ample amount of information about arts and history. For example, the museum financied by the government, and open for the people with a very low ticket cost.
Additionally, the government funds for art school, where a lot of sudents can learn about arts and craft, and explore different fields of arts that make them more competent artist. They can earn in low cost, and they have acces to the large amount of good artist of the country as teacher, in addition, with historial art. In future they can become a more competent artis, they keep significant impact in the arts and make the artsfloruish.
Moreover, art represents any countrys history and culture, so government must pay attention in this field. Othewise, the good arts will be vanished over the time, and the history will be died. For this reason, government should open a new department to work with art, improve the art, make new artist, prserve and present the art to the poople. Art is a good kind of entertainment and government should open new art gallary to make the art available to the people of the country.
However, when the government are dictative they control the stuject and nerrative of the arts, and this lead a closed environment for the artist to grow. Artist are creative and they need space to show their creative skillset, but because of the dictatorship the situation will be worse. The art and artist will not flousrin and grow over the time. Besides government any private or individuals all need to pay attention to the art and make art scholl and art galary for the scoeity. Moreover, art peice have a lot of finanal values, and it can be sold in the art market.
In conclusion, government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish, but besides government funding private funding also needed to flourish the field and make a significant change in the art sector that will provide significant art peace that will tell the history of present times in future generations.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 58
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utions and officials. In most countries, historical art are preserved by the gov...
^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ials. In most countries, historical art are preserved by the government, and the...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ved by the government, and they fund for the preservation of the arts. So, the p...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the government, and they fund for the preservation of the arts. So, the poepol...
^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they keep significant impact in the arts and make the artsfloruish. Moreover, ...
^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ironment for the artist to grow. Artist are creative and they need space to show th...
^^^
Line 9, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ace to show their creative skillset, but because of the dictatorship the situatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82035928144 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63776061171 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.423153692615 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 13.0 1.77640449438 732% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7786544541 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.617963621154 0.243740707755 254% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210700667089 0.0831039109588 254% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188523148228 0.0758088955206 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.389506266724 0.150359130593 259% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149380957783 0.0667264976115 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.