Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Imagine a classroom where some students are attentive in class and others are sleeping back in the classroom because they don’t feel interested in the topic in the lecture. We all undergo the same scenario at least once in a lifetime. I partially agree with the statement that when planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students. A student need to read lost courses and topic during a semester or a lesson but all course will not be interesting to the students. When educators design courses they need to take consider a lot of things like the job market, current trends, and upcoming growth in the world. Moreover, all student's interests are not the same so, a course will not be interesting to all the students also.
First of all, when student are interested in the subject they feel motivated to study the subject and the learning curve skyrocket. They invest a lot of time in the subject and sacrifice a lot of things to do better in the subject.
Sometimes they can learn by themselves from a different kind of source and make a better score in the subject, here classroom is the so much more important. For example, if an engineering student is interested in his subject he will spend a lot of time and learn a new skill easily that will make their career better and become a good workforce for the nation.
On the other hand, if the student doesn’t get interested in the subject they denounce the subject and get low marks in the exam. Sometimes they also leave engineering and become so depressed that leads to suicide, which is a common case in our society today.
Additionally, when students are interested in the subject they try to improve their knowledge of the subject, and they become scientists and make significant improvements in the subject. It is common in our society that students study only for job preparation but it does not lead society in a better direction. In Bangladesh most of the students in university study only for job preparation. They only pass their subjects with a low score, because they don’t get interested in the subject at all. But this low score in their grade sheet expresses their low seriousness in their study as a result they don’t get good Jobs.
Moreover, it is only possible to plan a course that will meet some student's interests. In today’s fast-paced world, there is internet in all hands, and students are exposed to diverse things. The test of interest changes a lot in today's world. So it is hard for educators to design a course that only contains interesting courses. Students don’t know the real education system and they are not experts on subjects in the courses. So educators try to maintain an international standard to provide a standard education. They try to keep all the students in a framework and lead the students in a shoplifted course. For example, a student in computer science is not interested in programming, which is the core subject of computer science. If a student doesn’t get interested in programming he should leave the major and try different things. And in the varsity label student has the freedom to choose their major and should take time to choose it properly.
In conclusion, student motivation is important for a better education in any field. So educators should include trendy and interesting subjects in the course so that they feel that they are studying. However, it is not possible in all field because some course has some major subject that must be taught in the course otherwise the course will be incomplete.
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 58
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 768, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... not be interesting to all the students also. First of all, when student are inte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2985.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 617.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83792544571 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98392262146 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69589670909 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.387358184765 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 913.5 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4009689786 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409885409911 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126066859614 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721443023664 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222227697781 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074135485663 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 768, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... not be interesting to all the students also. First of all, when student are inte...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2985.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 617.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83792544571 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98392262146 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69589670909 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.387358184765 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 913.5 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4009689786 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.5 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5666666667 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409885409911 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126066859614 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721443023664 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222227697781 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074135485663 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.