In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
In today's fast-paced digital world, any field needs different people with different backgrounds and different ages. The contribution of all people makes any field rich and dynamic. The notation states that in any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. While I partially disagree with the statement, I believe that beginners can also contribute in any field with their free perspective and outlook.
First of all, in any field that needs expertise and experience, there must be experts. They use their experience to solve a problem effectively and more accurately. For instance, in the medical field, doctors need to become more expert in handling any critical situation and need to use their experience to solve the problem effectively.
Additionally, any field that needs to create new knowledge, like research, can make a lot of difference from the neophyte.
As experts have prior knowledge about the subject, they can easily create new knowledge based on their previous knowledge. In the construction field, expert engineers can develop complex structures like the tallest tower in the world. A loss of hindrance will come, but they will use their problem-solving skills and critical thinking to solve the problem effectively.
Moreover, the expert learns from their mistakes and previous history. They have an understanding of the field through their mistakes and make a difference easily compared to the novice. For example, in the teaching profession, if you have experience, you can become a professor; otherwise, you can't be a professor, so for some fields, expertise is a must to excel.
However, in some cases, beginners can contribute a lot of things because they have a new outlook on the world, can see the world from a new perspective, and can solve any problem with modern tools and techniques. For example, in the technology world, in Silicon Valley, many beginners build a lot of technological products like Facebook and Google, which are fueling the fast-paced digital world. They have contributed a lot in these fields, though they are beginners.
In conclusion, in any field, experts are more likely than beginners to make important contributions, but beginners can also contribute with their fresh perspectives and outlooks. They can also flourish in the tech world easily, but in most fields, experts play a major role in making important contributions.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 295, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... can become a professor; otherwise, you cant be a professor, so for some fields, exp...
^^^^
Line 8, column 351, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...sor, so for some fields, expertise is a must to excel. However, in some cases, begin...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gical products like Facebook and Google, which are fueling the fast-paced digital...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29048843188 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95587344663 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452442159383 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8701991088 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.315789474 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4736842105 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68421052632 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387886268937 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150047086572 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164750421009 0.0758088955206 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217207308425 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15771586889 0.0667264976115 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.