Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.
In democratic countries, peoples have the right to elect their government. Obviously, they would choose the government who is educated, well behaved, and whose thought about the fairest of peoples. When considering about responsibilities of government, there are two dichotomies, whereas, some believe that government officials consider about the will of the people they serve, in contrast, others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment where my opinion aligns with the second half of the prompt.
Sometimes people are poorly informed about the important issue therefore if the government officials approved the people will unquestioningly it will create the worst situation for society. For example, during the second wave of coronavirus in Bangladesh and the same time, there was eid season, the government would decide that implement lockdown, moreover, shopping malls would become close and the businessmen were started striking against lockdown, therefore, the government has been forced to lift the lockdown. As a result, the coronavirus diffused fiercely.
Moreover, when any decision of a government official’s against with some group of people, they are providing impede to implement this decision even though it is good for society. Therefore, if the government considered their argument, the big interest will be hampered. For example, When the Mayor of Sylhet City Corporation intended to augment the beauty of Sylhet city by expanding the road, he encounters a dispute with some groups who are to occupied the surrounding area of the road. However, the mayor continued his aesthetic beauty enhancement work without considering their dispute.
Some may argue that, if the government officials were corrupted, will they perform their duties properly? It may true sometimes but, If the anti-corruption organization are concern about this issue that may mitigate the problem. Besides, the fear about the consequences of their current work would have a negative impact on the next election, this notion will stop them from corruption.
Considering the nuances of the issues, In most cases, the people are divided and poorly informed about an important issue consequently, they will fail to take the right decision and since the government officials are well known, educated and experienced body, therefore, people should rely on the government’s decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-23 | zanzendegi | 62 | view |
| 2022-09-17 | rockchisom | 79 | view |
| 2022-04-06 | Sumit68 | 83 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Anirudha Balaji Shirsikar | 66 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | pfftahsan | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l of the people they serve, in contrast, others believe that officials should bas...
^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ut considering their dispute. Some may argue that, if the government officials were ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 113, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'true'.
Suggestion: sometimes true
...y perform their duties properly? It may true sometimes but, If the anti-corruption organizatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in contrast, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57650273224 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91810569688 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535519125683 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.921955403 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.785714286 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.21951772744 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402921868406 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130658610656 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128932541098 0.0758088955206 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221971329364 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117506082753 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.