Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Is there a need, for the denizens of developed nations to change their lifestyle because of global climate change? Or is it not that harsh condition to make people change their lifestyle and reduce energy consumption? People believe in either views. I, however, would want to support the claim that people in developed countries should reduce their energy consumption and switch to a more sustainable lifestyle.
A big source for generating energy are the fossil fuels. As it is obvious that fossil fuels produce many waste by-products, they are certainly not a good source to produce energy. Moreover it is already time to switch to an alternate fuel, because there is already enough pollution done by mankind. Some scientists and researchers also say that at the current rate of pollution, global temperature will keep on rising and melting up the glaciers that would eventually increase the water level. They predict that in some years many coastal cities around the world would be completely submerged in water.
Moreover, fossil fuels are anyway decreasing in quantity and the population is constantly increasing. It is well understood that fossil fuels would not be a viable option to produce energy. People would ultimately have to move towards sustainable energy sources like solar and wind energy. Also, since the need of energy will always increase with the increase in population, it is really important to people to reduce their energy consumption per capita.
Since the energy generation by renewable sources, as of now, is not that good, governments around the world rely heavily on fossil energy. It would not be easy to generate the amount of energy required by the whole nation by means of renewable sources. Therefore, it is highly recommended to the people, that they reduce their energy consumption and shift towards a more sustainable lifestyle. For example, people could put of solar tiles in their homes to generate energy.
Some people could say that global climate change is not that great so as to make people change their lifestyle. They believe that we can still survive with the current way of living. But, why take the risk? Why should we wait till the time when climate change occurs at an extreme level and we do not have some viable solution to the problem? As the saying goes, precaution is better than cure. We should start moving towards a more sustainable lifestyle and try to figure out ways in we can generate a lot of renewable energy.
In conclusion, I would agree to the claim that climate change is increasing and people should reduce their energy consumption and shift towards sustainable lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Jeet Thkaur | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are 54
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 55
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 43
- "Scientific theories, which most people consider as 'fact: almost invariably prove to be inaccurate. Thus, one should look upon any information described as 'factual' with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future.&quo 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ly not a good source to produce energy. Moreover it is already time to switch to an alte...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...global climate change is not that great so as to make people change their lifestyle. The...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, however, if, moreover, really, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04555808656 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59530988068 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453302961276 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9707032411 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2916666667 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2916666667 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335470469746 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101244189017 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989199179772 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203853699231 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132230025746 0.0667264976115 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.