Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Political parties and their policies have been played an important role for economic and public lifestyle growth of a country. Whenever a government enacted a policy, most of them should be available publically.
So, I strongly disbelief the idea, that a political leader should hide policy from the public because maximum policies are made to upgrade the life of a public and economic growth of a country.
First of all, the public should ask questions to the political leader and this enquiries keeps the transparency in information. By keeping the transparency, that abstains government from malpractice and prevents scams. And secondly by continuously question public prevent the government by applying dictatorial policies.
There is an example which can buttress my opinion, which is comparison between two countries Switzerland and India. Switzerland is a direct democratic country and before approved any policy they organized vote and public vote for it or against the policy.
We all know that Switzerland has the Better economy in comparison to most of the developed country and peoples have a better lifestyle. On the other hand, India, though one of the largest democratic county, voting depends on a particular person and maximum policy kept hidden from the public. Although Government understands the importance of transparency between public and government, that’s why in 2005 government approved Right TO Information Act, where, again not all but majority information available for the public.
Some of the people can argue that continuously asking question can create anarchy and some of the deal, nuclear deal and arms deal should be kept hidden from the public as it is question of counties safety. But keeping the transparency between public and government mutual understanding can be increased. Public vote for a political party by their policies and they hope that the policies which are made for welfare of peoples, should not be withheld from the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | hyein | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | christine_cui | 75 | view |
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing TaskCar manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hyd 73
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 58
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing TaskA recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 70
- Essay topics: We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previous experience has been shooting commercials for a shampoo compa 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...k questions to the political leader and this enquiries keeps the transparency in inf...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...nformation available for the public. Some of the people can argue that continuously aski...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... asking question can create anarchy and some of the deal, nuclear deal and arms deal should...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38338658147 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88255764991 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504792332268 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8743567893 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.357142857 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276820741237 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993926348331 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604377023479 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147689927087 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604443407549 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.