Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Author’s claim represents the opposing viewpoints of peoples. Author posits that “Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction while other believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another”, though, both the statements holds some credit as due to increasing technology people are presumptuously using technology which in turn have shown its side effects, However, people are living long miles away are able to connect because of these technologies. It is paradox that technology plays both roles: keeping people connected as well as a reason for reduction of people interaction. It is well said that technology is curse as well as gift. People should learn about the disadvantage of these technologies as try to elude errant use such technologies.
In this competing world, people are traveling long distance in search of better job and it is technology because of which people, who are away from their loved ones are not feeling, departed from their loved ones. Many social media applications like, what’s App, Facebook, Instagram, etc. are playing major role in bringing people closer. Statistics have shown that use of such applications is increasing at very high rates. In my opinion, I do concede with the notion that technologies are really important in one’s life. I was admitted to college for my bachelor degree which was far away from my hometown, it was because of technology, I was able to talk and have day-to-day conversation with my family. Thus, Technology has brought people closer and instead in current scenario, it has become a medium, where people share their thought, emotions, etc.
However, because of people are too much indulged in technology, that they even don’t know who are living in their neighborhood. Technology became successful in bringing people living at long distance closer but it had proven to be bad for those who are living few miles away. Considering current situation, where people sitting next to each other, communicate with each other on social media applications instead of having face-to-face communication. People are failing to appreciate the nature over the enjoyment they get from these technologies. Thus, in such situation, one can say that technology have impeded the active communication among people and instead proliferated the passive ways of communication.
On wrapping up, as every coin have too sides, technology too have advantages and disadvantages. Technologies enabled in bringing people closer through various social media apps, but hamper the actual face-to-face communication or gatherings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Siddiqur Rahman | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Caveira meyona | 94 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Adebisi01 | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Adebisi01 | 83 | view |
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little. 66
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another. 83
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others. 66
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby 55
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 673, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ys both roles: keeping people connected as well as a reason for reduction of people intera...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...s every coin have too sides, technology too have advantages and disadvantages. Technolog...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50118764846 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09425070348 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522565320665 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 101.479089177 60.3974514979 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.894736842 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445875961759 0.243740707755 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113665076992 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134822069532 0.0758088955206 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2581849304 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183024058996 0.0667264976115 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 11.8971910112 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.