Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Logic can be built and acquired at any point of time in life, whereas morality can be acquired during initial stage of life acting as foundation of education. I would agree with the belief that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. This would do more to produce a moral society.
Even though morality and logic should go hand in hand, if morality is not there logic will not take too far. If a person is morally strong. He will be more hard working, would have a goal in life, would respect his parents, colleagues, friends and relatives, and will realize his responsibilities. When he is aware of responsibilities he will set his goals and built logic on his own to achieve those goals. To support I would like to give an example. Suppose, a person who is say logically very strong and his luck does not favor him resulting him to fail in one of very crucial exam. Person with a strong moral would not get depressed, instead he will realize his potential and work hard to clear the exam very next time. If person was morally very weak, he would just give up and go into depression.
"With great power, comes great responsibilities". A very successful person with great power and achievement in life should be morally strong. Today the president of the United States of America, Mr. Barac Obama, he considered to be the most powerful person on earth. He has the power to use nuclear weapon and destroy the word. However, it is his moral skills which makes him to take the right decisions. It is his moral values which makes him even more respectful.
Morality is something which can not be built overnight. It comes in one's nature and character which one builds since childhood. Logic is something one can build and achieve with persistent effort and hard work. An arduous person will not take time to scale up his logical abilities, but to do that he needs to be morally strong. Thus, teaching morality should be the foundation of education.
Success comes from a well moral and pragmatic person. Morality is stepping stone to success. Logic can be built at later stage of life. Thus, we can extrapolate that teaching morality should be the foundation of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | abhbat | 50 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 75
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military. 70
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 66
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 50
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... not there logic will not take too far. If a person is morally strong. He will be ...
^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...can not be built overnight. It comes in ones nature and character which one builds s...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214780600462 0.240241500013 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.168591224018 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0785219399538 0.0880659088768 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0739030023095 0.0497285424764 149% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0623556581986 0.0444667217837 140% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0923787528868 0.12292977631 75% => OK
Participles: 0.0277136258661 0.0406280797675 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70576801584 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0300230946882 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00461893764434 0.0016655270985 277% => OK
Determiners: 0.0531177829099 0.0997080785238 53% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0554272517321 0.0249443105267 222% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.013856812933 0.0148568991511 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2207.0 2732.02544248 81% => OK
No of words: 384.0 452.878318584 85% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74739583333 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.291666666667 0.366273622748 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.213541666667 0.280924506359 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.1484375 0.200843997647 74% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0885416666667 0.132149295362 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70576801584 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 219.290929204 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 49.6505145163 55.4138127331 90% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.7692307692 23.380412469 63% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2955488167 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8846153846 141.124799967 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7692307692 23.380412469 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.269230769231 0.674092028746 40% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 36.1233974359 51.4728631049 70% => OK
Elegance: 1.09848484848 1.64882698954 67% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314436441475 0.391690518653 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122700452836 0.123202303941 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.114766913824 0.077325440228 148% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.432671574982 0.547984918172 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11881578363 0.149214159877 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117977541696 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138548231229 0.0892212321368 155% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.291320434358 0.385218514788 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0629888503629 0.0692045440612 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254136130155 0.275328986314 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131355684502 0.0653680567796 201% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.