Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Success is achieved after years of dedicated work and innovation. Most of us have ideas but we care too much about the opinion of others. In contrast, people who tend to work hard on their ideas to convert them into a reality, regardless of being faced with doubts and criticism of others, are often the ones who leave a lasting legacy. To achieve success, other people's doubts and criticism do not matter as long as the idea is not harmful to the human society.
Most of the people do not understand the potential of an idea a person may possess. Unarguably, the person who came up with an idea is the one who knows its true capability. If the idea is criticized by many people, the innovator will not be able to fully utilize his time to bring the idea to life due to the time wasted in the explanations and providing justifications. Thus, the innovator should safeguard his idea when it is ridiculed by an anyone and not immediately respond to such negative comments. Instead, he or she should continue working and prove all the naysayers wrong.
Furthermore, an idea which appears to be a waste of resources may not necessarily be useless. For instance, exploration of space is argued by people to be a tremendous waste of money. However, the scientific discoveries of bodies surrounding the earth has helped the humans to predict the possible meteor strikes locations, thereby vacating the potentially affected areas and preventing loss of human lives. In the end, although the idea of space exploration is criticized by many, many lives were saved as the idea was brought to reality by space researchers.
In contrast to above discussion, sometimes a proposed idea is extreme to the extent that it attacks certain people's beliefs, causing controversies. In such cases, the dropping of the idea is a better choice.
From the above discussion, it is apparent that the people who do not respond to every doubt and criticism they face, are the ones who usually leave a lasting legacy. However, in cases of ideas that attack certain beliefs, the idea should preclude.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-24 | Ruhani | 66 | view |
2023-07-18 | jayauen | 50 | view |
2023-06-23 | the.umair__ | 75 | view |
2022-06-30 | sag15 | 83 | view |
2022-04-09 | harvey_elliot | 66 | view |
- We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take 50
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 58
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 75
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporti 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'anyone'?
Suggestion: an; anyone
...eguard his idea when it is ridiculed by an anyone and not immediately respond to such neg...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...peoples beliefs, causing controversies. In such cases, the dropping of the idea is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, as to, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84550561798 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74621286095 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3833745304 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.470588235 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9411764706 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225143879006 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692971941554 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752113461187 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128515768881 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636145006577 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.