Today it is clear that increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good for mankind
In today's world technology has taken over most of the daily chores of most people, which has made human life very easy and efficient. It's hard to imagine a day in which we can complete our daily jobs without taking any help from technology. The statement here shows a negative opinion of the intervention of technology in the lives of humans. According to me it's not technology which has caused such harm but its frivolous and unsupervised use.
Technology has overall made human lives easy and time efficient but its extravagant use has made the problems that are evident today. Like, the use of cars and other vehicles greatly saves our transportation time. But on the other hand everyone is using their own vehicle which led to pollution which is causing eventual environmental degradation. This issue again can be solved by technology by replacing fuel efficient vehicles and using alternate fuels which causes less pollution.
Use of computers has made data transfer and communication so easy. Which is now beneficial in hospitals for medical treatment. Patients are more aware of the treatments. A person can consult a doctor over internet which can save a lot of effort and time in case of emergency. People can buy products online and can choose from a variety of options sitting at home and the products are delivered at their door. Although overuse of computer has also some negative effects. Many sites use private data to their advantage. According to a recent news, the face app is alleged to use the person picture anywhere they want taken from that app, which can create privacy leak.
In conclusion, overuse of everything is harmful. Technology can be a bliss is used carefully. But it can be more dangerous if used otherwise
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-25 | invisible_string | 58 | view |
| 2020-09-18 | invisible_string | 58 | view |
| 2020-08-29 | Shubham Borkar | 50 | view |
| 2020-08-24 | SBhutoo | 16 | view |
| 2020-08-06 | candelab | 58 | view |
- We learn through direct experience; to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all. 50
- Today it is clear that increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good for mankind 50
- Today it is clear that increasing use of technology has caused more harm than good for mankind 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had litt 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...n of technology in the lives of humans. According to me its not technology which has caused suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...in the lives of humans. According to me its not technology which has caused such ha...
^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e products are delivered at their door. Although overuse of computer has also some negat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 295.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93559322034 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70576432566 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579661016949 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0779668168 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6315789474 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5263157895 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68421052632 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1922084281 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639872640823 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525561215168 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126538922639 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339976218926 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.