Where true beauty can be found, In commonplace or in exceptional? Some people would argue that true beauty is in commonplace like trees and flowers, However, others would state that true beauty is in exceptional. After weighing the evidence, it is certain that true beauty belongs to exceptional places like Siose Pol and Takht Jamshid, not in commonplaces.
Siose Pol is one of the most beautiful and exceptional bridges in the world, which is in Isfahan and many tourists visit this exceptional artwork annually. It is so beautiful that many people stand for hours to watch and enjoy it. Its beauty is more noticeable when the Zayanderood river has water and you can see the bridge reflection on the water. Especially at night the reflection of Siose Pol blends with the reflection of the moon and creates an exceptional scene. There are many bridges in Iran, but they are common and do not have noticeable beauty to enjoy; therefore, Siose Pol proves that beauty is in exceptional.
One should not think that beauty only can be found in a common scene or a picture; in contrast, beauty can be found in rich culture and history too. Like Siose Pol, Korush tomb is the obvious example of exceptional beauty. Korosh is one of the most famous Iranian kings, whose tomb is in Takhte Jamshid in Shiraz city. Although Korosh tomb is not a very big place, it has a very rich history. History of an era when Iran had a great and just king, who ruled over a great kingdom. This tomb remembers the Iranian that they have a great nation with a great history; So, this relation and sensation between Iranian and their king is exceptional. This noticeable tomb is very different from common tombs which have little historical and cultural value; thus, this example clearly shows that beauty only can be found in exceptional places, not in common places.
Some people might say that common places are more beautiful than exceptional places and more attention should be paid to those places. For example, they might say that enjoying a sunset or walking in a jungle gives positive energy, helps to think and concentrate better, and frees the human mind. Although in some cases they are right, after a while these places become boring and lose their attraction; hence, their argument is not right.
As the bulk of evidence shows, the exceptional, not common places have true beauty. in conclusion, Siose Pol bridge and Korosh tomb prove that true beauty lies in exceptional, which not only are beautiful but also have historical and cultural values; in opposition, After few visits common scenes become boring but, the emotional and sensational values of exceptional places never bore the visitors.
The writer of the argument claims without any sound grounds that (restatement of the conclusion). Stated in this way, the argument reveals several instances of poor reasoning and ill-defined terminology. In support of this argument, the author notes that (State the main flaw/assumption). However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for the author’s conclusion. Hence the argument can be considered incomplete or unsubstantiated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, in contrast, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2113.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87990762125 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50527660804 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459584295612 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0667155128 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.619047619 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375775736332 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123985225042 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149693243507 0.0758088955206 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231036855848 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171556651982 0.0667264976115 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.