A successful organization is one which is led by a leader who fully understands the past of early leaderships, Acknowledges the merits and demerits of decisions taken in the past.
A successful government is formed when it is led by a leader who is fully aware of the past of the leaderships in government, those who have led the nation. Also a leader who has learned a lot from the mistakes and setbacks of these past government and their leaders.
For a leader to be able to govern and run a nation, it is vital to understand that there are many decisions which a person thinks are for the betterment of the society, but when these decisions are taken, they are taken in the wrong way by the people. Such a failure of leadership that has taken place in the past is considered a critical source for improvement for anyone in the current government.
This understanding of the past of a nation or the people or the mistakes made by their previous leaders can play a crucial role in avoiding the failure of a new government led by a new leader. A leader who fully understands what people of the nation have been wanting from a true leader, whom they believe will do better for them; On whom people believe that he would bring prosperity, development and strong economy in the nation.
In an assembly, there are a lot of matters on which the current ruling party and the opposition party debate on while introducing a bill, or law for the betterment of the society and people. In such a debate it can be clearly seen that the party introducing the law, introduces it with all the pros of the same bill. However, the opposition party acknowledges the pros but also critically raises their concerns and objections against the cons of the same bill.
This scenario helps the current leader in crucial times when he is taking such decisions. It helps to consider and evaluate both the pros and cons of each decision he is about to take for the betterment of the society, which are all the signs of a truly great leader.
Although in the case of running a private company, their leader has to be futuristic, His focus is only on the future of the company. He needs to be one step ahead and some decisions which the leader takes should be irrespective of their past outcomes because, with the change in time, one needs to improvise their thoughts and decisions which are indeed for the betterment and success for the same organization, a leader who is thinking ahead of his time.
It can be said that although past knowledge is a very crucial and vital element in the smooth and successful running of any public organization or political party, In some case for instance if it's a private organization or a private company, they need to take decisions and move ahead regardless of the outcomes in the past.
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 50
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs. 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 62
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ernment, those who have led the nation. Also a leader who has learned a lot from the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...erstands what people of the nation have been wanting from a true leader, whom they believe w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 194, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...cal party, In some case for instance if its a private organization or a private com...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, as to, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61553784861 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.682281827 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.398406374502 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.616292202 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.466666667 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4666666667 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125665318521 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527955255067 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498081211434 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698586074616 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442038752284 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.