A field of inquiry involves examination, investigation, exploration, etc. For someone to be successful in this vast domain or be at the zenith, it is rudimentary to have qualities like great enthusiasm, high spirits, Positive attitude, an admiration which are not so facile to have. Some of these qualities certainly develop over a period of time with experience in your field and some of these qualities you can have, from your growing up times since you were in school or college.
But to raise a query over who could possibly make an important contribution to the field of inquiry; will it be an expert, who has given a significant amount of time of his life or is it a beginner who just wants to fit in, this comparison of intellect is totally absurd.
A person who is an expert or who is at the epitome in the field of inquiry, has ground experience, as he has spent years in the field, developing his thought process according to the situations he had been through in the field, he has done his research, adapted and modified his thought processes when he must have faced some deadends, making him feel exacerbated. He has assumed himself in such situations, where he would have tried to figure out all possible ways what he would have done, just to just solve and find out the hidden details of the inquiry. And this can be in any of the fields (examination, investigation, exploration, etc).
On the contrary, the beginner will not have much to offer, as all he has is some theoretical knowledge which might have been taught to him while in college, taking classes or undergoing some training, which is certainly not a thing compared to the things (situations) are when you are actually facing such situations practically. Especially if you are investigating some crime scenes. For instance, if there is a crime scene and there is a team of 6 agents and they are working over the investigation part where they would question every one of the eyewitnesses of the crime scene. If a person who has some relevant information or any sort of information which could be found useful towards progress in the case or could lead towards easily solving the case, if the newly trained beginner starts to question such an eye witness, he might skip out some important questions, or he might not be able to deduce or comprehend the piece of information shared by the witness.
Nonetheless, it can certainly be the point that some beginners will definitely have out of the box thinking which can prove to be of useful part of the inquiry or have the vision to look at things in a different way and with a different perspective.
However, this can be of remarkable use to the field and all of this can be turned into fruitful outcomes only if their enthusiasm to create a difference is nurtured by an expert or the elite they work under. Someone who could be of assistance to them and help them by guiding these beginners in their journey, because we have to accept the fact that with age and experience comes wisdom and this wisdom shall not be wasted and should be shared with such beginners while working with or under them. This will nourish them and teach them about how we should deal in such situations, where elites use their years of experience and their reflexes, which come into action as they have developed over years of work and research.
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs. 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 66
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.(2) 66
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hese qualities certainly develop over a period of time with experience in your field and some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...llege. But to raise a query over who could possibly make an important contribution to the f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fields'' or 'field's'?
Suggestion: fields'; field's
... inquiry. And this can be in any of the fields examination, investigation, exploration...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 198, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ry or have the vision to look at things in a different way and with a different perspective. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, thus, while, for instance, sort of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2773.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 591.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69204737733 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93056706295 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69654811951 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451776649746 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 875.7 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 23.0359550562 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.0047221061 60.3974514979 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.866666667 118.986275619 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.4 23.4991977007 168% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135362593033 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499642049606 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480759202174 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781976174505 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522213630566 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 14.1392134831 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 11.2143820225 157% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.