Yes, it is important to have good moral judgment in your life, but all alone this quality will not be enough. Especially when you want yourself to be seen as a successful leader.
A successful leader is not just one with high moral judgments, but it is one who hears what his peers have to say, what they can bring to the table when it's open for discussions. Do they feel hesitant while approaching him, are his relations with them cordial and respectful, or do they fear that they will be judged on moral high grounds?
It is vital for a person that in order to be a perfect leader he needs to acknowledge one critical factor and that is, is respected by his peers? Because it is known that when a leader is too judgmental or loses his calm easily, he loses his respect from his peers. Peers start feeling reluctant against such a leader.
The leader should understand that it's his colleagues and his team that would be there in his difficult times not only when he is at work, but also as a helping hand in his personal life and this can only happen if he is a great leader and he can help his team achieve their true potential and maximum output. They are the ones who help a leader through the time when the project needs to be fully filled on time which has critical deadlines.
As it comes as an example from our practical life, we all have our peers from work who are now an important part of our life. They have their role in good and bad moments in our life. If a leader takes the moral high ground and starts to judge his peers he will lose them and also lose a crucial part of his life. A leader should understand that how he treats his peers also have an impact on his peers both emotionally and mentally and it further impacts their personal life. After a bad day at work, no one can go to a home with high spirits and that not a way in which one would expect to reach home.
But only if we look at this, from a leader's personal perspective. He might consider being morally judgmental as an important factor because when it comes to professionalism both lives should not mix and his personal relations with his peers should not be a barrier in his decision making professionally. He has to take decisions and make choices taking into consideration the position he represents and from this point, this mindset can be considered valid. This is why it is commonly that it is always lonely at the top because as you grow forward you leave your peers behind.
To sum up it can be said that a balance in professional and personal life is important, especially when you are a leader and your people look forward to you. You would want their support and expect that they take a stand for you not just because you are superior; but because they care.
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 83
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.(2) 66
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. 50
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 66
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 35, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...der. The leader should understand that its his colleagues and his team that would ...
^^^
Line 10, column 35, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a leader' or simply 'leaders'?
Suggestion: a leader; leaders
...e. But only if we look at this, from a leaders personal perspective. He might consider...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, as to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 90.0 33.0505617978 272% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37015503876 5.05705443957 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.378704465 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426356589147 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4067419054 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217437134649 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077266488651 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595698753291 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121922841646 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054812281853 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 12.1639044944 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.