Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more Cmportant than the reality or truth behind that image.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Veritable traits and characteristics are more consequential than online popularity or online activity. I don't cerebrate that having a positive self-image might make one forget who they genuinely are.
One's outward look has come to define them in today's culture. There hasn't been much of a shift in people's daily lives offline, but the cyber world has. Many people's first impressions of you are predicated on the images they visually perceive of you on convivial media. Posting photos of extravagant repasts and stylish apparel can increment your popularity. Those who optically discern your peculiar images or no photos at all may have the opinion that you're mentally ill. The puissance of a viral photograph on gregarious media was shown. Some people claimed that Hillary Clinton was dying during the precedent presidential campaign. With a photo of herself in good health, Clinton put a terminus to the rumour. Presenting a professional and polished image is crucial in today's world.
First impressions matter in many jobs. Beguiling advertising or promotion may raise sales and boost a company's prosperity. Popular music is homogeneous. Popular artists ken that building fan bases may boost album sales and other opportunities. Even if the media misreports the situation, the public will fixate on the good aspects.
First impressions are consequential, but a fleeting vision won't survive the test of time. With time and investigation, the veracity may emerge. Even aspect-dependent persons can distinguish authenticity from fiction. This difference may disclose someone's veridical motives despite their seeming veracity. People lose interest when a car's performance and stability don't match the odometer. Consider a CD cover. Can solemn music enthusiasts ignore the cheese? not equipollent
To obviate making erroneous appearance-predicated judgments, we must be well-apprised. We won't overemphasise the above criteria. Given how expeditiously a first impression might grab our attention, we may trust a precise interpretation. In turn, we overvalue products. Optical discernment and data amassing are key for insights. Such energy might eradicate perspective distortion and reveal the veracity. Contrary to mundane opinion, a car's odometer may disclose its condition. If we're more objective, we can evade gimmicky facades.
In conclusion, It's consequential for regimes and communities to provide a propitious picture of their civilisation, even if doing so isn't macrocosmically visually perceived as moral or fair. This is a trend that has appeared in several fields, including the visual arts, the cosmetics industry, the culinary arts, and architecture. much homogeneous to yesterday, then.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-13 | jeevansreeram | 16 | view |
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 62
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville All students should be required to take the driver s education course at Centerville High School In the past two years several accidents in and around Centerville have invol 70
- Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complained indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change Furthermore many server 68
- The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fits and cholesterol and today low fat products abound in many food sto 16
- The following appeared in a memo from the business manager of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all 59
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...online popularity or online activity. I dont cerebrate that having a positive self-i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...to define them in todays culture. There hasnt been much of a shift in peoples daily l...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 453, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...photos at all may have the opinion that youre mentally ill. The puissance of a viral ...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 365, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t when a cars performance and stability dont match the odometer. Consider a CD cover...
^^^^
Line 10, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Not
...mn music enthusiasts ignore the cheese? not equipollent To obviate making ...
^^^
Line 16, column 134, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...of their civilisation, even if doing so isnt macrocosmically visually perceived as m...
^^^^
Line 16, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Much
...y, the culinary arts, and architecture. much homogeneous to yesterday, then.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69041769042 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24972362771 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665847665848 0.4932671777 135% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 23.0359550562 48% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7466645795 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.1176470588 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.9705882353 23.4991977007 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.82352941176 5.21951772744 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800267024086 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0155387626087 0.0831039109588 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323404413627 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0347156245635 0.150359130593 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443036802509 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.39 48.8420337079 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.83 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 11.2143820225 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...online popularity or online activity. I dont cerebrate that having a positive self-i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...to define them in todays culture. There hasnt been much of a shift in peoples daily l...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 453, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...photos at all may have the opinion that youre mentally ill. The puissance of a viral ...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 365, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t when a cars performance and stability dont match the odometer. Consider a CD cover...
^^^^
Line 10, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Not
...mn music enthusiasts ignore the cheese? not equipollent To obviate making ...
^^^
Line 16, column 134, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...of their civilisation, even if doing so isnt macrocosmically visually perceived as m...
^^^^
Line 16, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Much
...y, the culinary arts, and architecture. much homogeneous to yesterday, then.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69041769042 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24972362771 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665847665848 0.4932671777 135% => OK
syllable_count: 735.3 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 23.0359550562 48% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7466645795 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.1176470588 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.9705882353 23.4991977007 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.82352941176 5.21951772744 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800267024086 0.243740707755 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0155387626087 0.0831039109588 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323404413627 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0347156245635 0.150359130593 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443036802509 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.39 48.8420337079 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.83 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.38706741573 122% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 11.2143820225 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.