Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.

Essay topics:

Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.

Education is one of the main basic standard through which a nation can measure its growth & development index. It is an issue of much debate either to enforce students to take additional courses of different discipline during university education or not & there are many valid argument to both of the side. What I feel is that universities should not force them to take those courses but of course should have provision for those who are enthusiastic, energetic & traditional academic lessons cannot satiate their insatiable appetite for learning.

Learning is a continuous process where our universities play an important role by serving as an institution to assist mostly academic as well as enriching our mental & spiritual state by allowing us a wide field of resource additional to academic goal. Although there are no limit for learning, most of the time we need to focus on particular goal & work on that. During graduation a student specializes in a particular subject & focuses on that specific topic. But if the university imposes some different courses, it can thwart his spirit because he may not be interested in those topics, sometimes it may be of very little relevance to the area of his specialization. For example, a CSE student enrolled in a course of ancient roman poetry, which may add nothing to his specialization. Again, if we look at typical south Asian culture, a student enters into the university with a lot of hope to complete graduation, get a job, support his family. But if he is forced to take some additional courses irrelevant to his major, it will not only be a waste of his valuable time but also cost him some money which could have been used in some more useful purpose to support his family.

On the other hand, additional courses are not irrelevant all the time. For example, an Engineering student may need some knowledge on microcontroller to take part in a robotic challenge competition though he can have no academic knowledge about it & that is why enrolling in that course will not be a waste of money & time. Moreover, academic knowledge cannot always satiate the voracious learner & that's why if he is not satisfied there should be path open for them. Academic knowledge can help us to build up a career but it's not enough to let the great be born. Shakespeare, Rabindranath, Adison they were not born by the conventional learning pattern rather they searched for the it by being dissenter from typical wisdom & academic knowledge. If we only focus on academics & excellence than there will not be anyone to bring out what has not been done, no one to bring the light where it was empty before.

Finally, it is evident that we cannot allow to impose something on us, at the same time there should have some provision for those who wants to learn more. As, because we live in a multi faceted world, every person should have some basic knowledge outside his discipline to understand a certain perspective more deeply as learning has no limits.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-26 arjun2112 33 view
2019-12-12 nimesh94 66 view
2019-10-30 lucy2244 66 view
2019-09-07 Mohit Raghuvanshi 58 view
2019-06-16 nealsaha1007 50 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'limits'?
Suggestion: limits
...to academic goal. Although there are no limit for learning, most of the time we need ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...example, an Engineering student may need some knowledge on microcontroller to tak...
^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... always satiate the voracious learner & thats why if he is not satisfied there should...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to pattern'
Suggestion: to pattern
...e not born by the conventional learning pattern rather they searched for the it by bein...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...arning pattern rather they searched for the it by being dissenter from typical wisdom...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 707, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y searched for the it by being dissenter from typical wisdom & academic knowledge...
^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before. Finally, it is evident that we cannot allow to impose something on u...
^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'imposing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: imposing
...ly, it is evident that we cannot allow to impose something on us, at the same time there...
^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'i feel', 'of course', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.202846975089 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.151245551601 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0996441281139 0.0880659088768 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0551601423488 0.0497285424764 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0693950177936 0.0444667217837 156% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.115658362989 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0266903914591 0.0406280797675 66% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.79645803022 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0373665480427 0.030933414821 121% => OK
Particles: 0.00355871886121 0.0016655270985 214% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0996441281139 0.0997080785238 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0355871886121 0.0249443105267 143% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0195729537367 0.0148568991511 132% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3000.0 2732.02544248 110% => OK
No of words: 520.0 452.878318584 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76923076923 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.334615384615 0.366273622748 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253846153846 0.280924506359 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175 0.200843997647 87% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123076923077 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79645803022 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 219.290929204 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501923076923 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 59.811005129 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.8888888889 23.380412469 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9952875001 59.4972553346 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.666666667 141.124799967 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8888888889 23.380412469 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.674092028746 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 54.2735042735 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.25161290323 1.64882698954 76% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306581994496 0.391690518653 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119565564017 0.123202303941 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0489229467996 0.077325440228 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.49753840291 0.547984918172 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126055620391 0.149214159877 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11278489276 0.161403998019 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597132240384 0.0892212321368 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.334720044039 0.385218514788 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0668651847636 0.0692045440612 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210409899132 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811764164811 0.0653680567796 124% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK

---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.