As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Knowledge is acquired everyday directly through observations or indirectly through other means like even communicating with a friend, reading books, going to work e.t.c . The ability to comprehend and understand this acquired knowledge varies and mysterious. I mostly agree with the statement that the more we know the less we seem to understand even what we think we already know as they become more composite. The next two paragraphs will give more clarification to my point of view.
To begin with, many fields of study are wide and deep but we start learning from the rudiments of these topic by taking a narrow look and the introductory aspect which could make the topic look simple. For instance, when in secondary school pupils are introduced to subjects like integrated science and it seems it is well understood, on getting into senior secondary school, it is divided into biology, physics and chemistry and it makes the student marvel. As if that is not enough, on getting to university a choice has to be made between studying physics or chemistry and topics are further broken down into complex elements, this makes the student wonder if they will ever completely understand these courses. We still have not delved into studying the same course like physics at the doctorate level, hence people become amazed at a lot of assumptions that have been made and how much more research that needs to be carried out to perfect one’s knowledge.
Furthermore, based on religious sentiments man already had some set of beliefs that came through revered men of God or through the respected priest that is dedicated to their idols and any research that might prove otherwise will be resisted as it not only gets complicated for them it makes their deity seems to have less potency. For example, in the classical era man was made to first believe that the earth was a square in shape and that people lived inside the earth. The first set of scientists and philosophers like Sir Issac Newton and Aristotle to state that the earth was actually spherical in shape, that people lived on top of the earth and was held firmly to the surface by the force of gravitation were not only rebuffed but went through persecutions and some were even sentenced to death. Their new found knowledge made their perceived understanding of their environment more intricated and less unsure of what exactly they all know.
In conclusion, some people argue that more understanding is attained through acquiring more knowledge, however the everyday consequence of our assumptions is yet to be understood. Some deceases like cancer are as a result of global warming caused by mans activity and which we still do not have any means to eradicate hence the more information we get the more complex and puzzled we are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-06 | sahil nain | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | graceeehgq | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | Chaitanya02 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | fangzr2 | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | anushashah | 78 | view |
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and support 63
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 75
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 66
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
Knowledge is acquired everyday directly through observations or indire...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...iend, reading books, going to work e.t.c . The ability to comprehend and understan...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this topic' or 'these topics'?
Suggestion: this topic; these topics
...we start learning from the rudiments of these topic by taking a narrow look and the introdu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: spherical
...le to state that the earth was actually spherical in shape, that people lived on top of the earth ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, second, so, still, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9343220339 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65202247914 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531779661017 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 731.7 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.448728984 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.357142857 118.986275619 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.7142857143 23.4991977007 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.21951772744 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196427110725 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720629298907 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673009242941 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140179214746 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848886689359 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.