As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but
more complex and mysterious.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The argument is motivated by the thought that " with increasing complexity the gradient of understanding decreases" , this argument is acceptable to an extent, since as we
know more and more about anything, the components or parts to understand and connect within it increase resulting much more complex theory. However, this does not
necessarily imply that with more knowledge we can't comprehend what we now know about, it' s just that the effort and prerequisite to understand the same will increase.
In fact, till the 19th century, the world was under the impression that the cell was the small unit of life considering it to be the building block of all the things that exist.
On the other hand, around 1970 we came to a general acceptance that this is not the case, and that cells too can be divided further. The knowledge we had around 1900 was
less and hence the comparable complexity of understanding the basic element of life was easier than during 1970, but the large acceptance of the idea of dividing the cell
further is proof that a significant majority was convinced with the proof suggesting they understood the idea and accepted it.
Conversely, with a different course of thinking one can say that increasing knowledge about a thing may result in more confusion, in fact when we dig more deeply
inside anything we come across new phenomena that can't be explained as mysterious but with time a plausible explanation does arise. When we first saw the nucleus within an atom,
it surprised the world with no ready explanation of what, why, and how. In the next decade, multiple explanations were coined, and we got the explanation we dreath
of and solved the mystery.
The relation between knowledge and comprehensibility is always subject, for some the same system will be too complex to understand but for some the same system is too easy,
it all depends on the knowledge you carry with you. So, with more knowledge, we actually explain the complexity and mysterious nature of things making them more
understandable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-06 | sahil nain | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | graceeehgq | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | Chaitanya02 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | fangzr2 | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | anushashah | 78 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 66
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to ad 62
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 66
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- The chart below provides details about the ownership of electrical appliances and the number of hours spent on housework for the period of 1920 to 2019 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...radient of understanding decreases' , this argument is acceptable to an exten...
^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is acceptable to an extent, since as we know more and more about anything, the c...
^^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e complex theory. However, this does not necessarily imply that with more knowled...
^^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...arily imply that with more knowledge we cant comprehend what we now know about, it s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er. The knowledge we had around 1900 was less and hence the comparable complexity...
^^^
Line 6, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eptance of the idea of dividing the cell further is proof that a significant majo...
^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nfusion, in fact when we dig more deeply inside anything we come across new pheno...
^^^
Line 10, column 51, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...thing we come across new phenomena that cant be explained as mysterious but with tim...
^^^^
Line 10, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...we first saw the nucleus within an atom, it surprised the world with no ready exp...
^^^
Line 11, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed, and we got the explanation we dreath of and solved the mystery. The relat...
^^^
Line 14, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut for some the same system is too easy, it all depends on the knowledge you carr...
^^^
Line 15, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erious nature of things making them more understandable.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, may, so, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99420289855 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85539918178 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539130434783 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.0512644631 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.3 118.986275619 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 23.4991977007 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 4.97078651685 262% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278853482664 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111182966179 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883788922098 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982200215686 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108127191166 0.0667264976115 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 48.8420337079 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.