The assertion that as one acquires more knowledge, things tend to become more complex and mysterious as opposed to the expectations of understanding a certain thing, is certainly debatable. Some might argue that things become unintelligible as one acquires more knowledge and seem complex and arcane. On the contrary, others might contend that more information about a topic facilitates a better understanding. I disagree with the claim and believe that there is no direct correspondence between the increase in knowledge and the increase in complexity.
First of all, knowledge has no boundaries and extends beyond one's knowledge. When a child comes across his first experience with a car, he defies the principles of gravity and visualizes a flying car. Unaware of the fact that a car cannot disobey the principles of gravity, educating a child immediately about gravity without the fundamentals of physics would confuse a child. Eventually, once he is abreast of the laws of physics and with the acquisition of this knowledge, the confusing and mysterious concepts of gravity fall into place. Hence, the concept of gravity is more comprehensible by this child. Likewise, when one gains knowledge, things tend to make sense and is easy to understand.
Secondly, when we learn new things, we are able to logically connect the previous things learnt so far. It resembles a chain of events where the knowledge of one topic is crucial to understand another topic. Suppose, a physicist wants to explore more about genetics without having any prior knowledge of the functioning of cells, even the definition of 'gene' could seem unfathomable to understand. Instead, if the same physicist obtains a thorough knowledge of the cells and then advances his studies in genetics, things aren't mysterious or difficult anymore.
In addition to this, one develops a fear to go on a quest for knowledge due to reasons like failure of understanding what a topic means. For instance, research is an astounding example which embodies this scenario. Marie Curie, a chemist was working in her laboratory and she always was on a quest to observe properties of her chemical elements and gain knowledge. This new knowledge helped her to discover the popular radioactive element called Curium. If new knowledge was an obstacle to understanding, many other scientific discoveries would not have been witnessed.
Thus, in conclusion, one gets a clearer picture in one's mind when they gain knowledge. More knowledge doesn't imply complexity and indeed, helps in a better understanding of the same topic.
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because 43
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 50
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 50
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...dvances his studies in genetics, things arent mysterious or difficult anymore. In...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'was'.
Suggestion: was always
...t was working in her laboratory and she always was on a quest to observe properties of her...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hen they gain knowledge. More knowledge doesnt imply complexity and indeed, helps in a...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25120772947 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02331330614 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548309178744 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8219347032 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.523809524 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249618517356 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781604079371 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111575163727 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152847880103 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132349260873 0.0667264976115 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.