The issue of if we learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own as disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that a human being learns more from people whose views contradict our own, because we learn the other side of the story about issue which makes us to draw a better conclusion and may be share empathy with them. Everything in world is not black and white, there are grey regions too.
Like every coin has two sides, so is with every issue. We are sometimes more biased to choose a side because of our own assumptions and prejudices and are not aware of the other side of view. Everything in the world is not black or white, good or bad, there are some issues which are in the grey zone and without understanding the other we won't be able to make a good judgement. If we only interact with the people who share our views we will be just satisfying our ego and prejudices, without actually understanding the issue in holistic approach.
Secondly, what if we are not aware about the facts properly and our conclusion is based on inchoate reasons.To illustrate, let us suppose government is purchasing few acres of farm land from farmers to make a new airport and due to this there are processions, hunger strikes by farmers. Now, without actually understanding the other side of issue, you are supporting the government decision to build the airport as it will be good for city economically and give you a better transport to travel. But what if we try to understand the other side as well, how this will affect the poor farmers. Discussing it with the people who supports the other side will surely help you learn more and make a better conclusion. Perhaps the social and economic surveys shows that these farmers are uneducated and unskilled and don't have other mode to earn their living and a better way out will to shift the airport to some other part of city.
Some may argue that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. This depends upon the person you are debating with, how logically soundness of his/her reasons, whether he is shouting or putting his points properly. A good debate never cause stress, it can only increase your learning and make you conclude better.
In conclusion, a logical and learned person have an obligation to understand the other side of view which makes them better equipped to conclude and make a decision. For these reasons, we can learn more from the people whose views contradict our own.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 75
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 78
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. 66
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 53
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... We are sometimes more biased to choose a side because of our own assumptions an...
^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...conclusion is based on inchoate reasons.To illustrate, let us suppose government i...
^^
Line 5, column 811, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...armers are uneducated and unskilled and dont have other mode to earn their living an...
^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...o some other part of city. Some may argue that disagreement can cause stress and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2153.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73186813187 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52336407601 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468131868132 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2191066922 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.647058824 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7647058824 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436814871981 0.243740707755 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1646356875 0.0831039109588 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.228274287899 0.0758088955206 301% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285637255398 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198265523518 0.0667264976115 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.