We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose
views contradict our own.
Nowadays lifestyles are changing faster than foretime owing to the existence of various beliefs and their impacts on people living. Some people believe that learning from people who we share their belief is effective than those ideas are in opposition to our beliefs, but others declare learning from contractive views is stable than sharing the same views. In as much as I am concerned, that learning from opposing views and sharing people's views is important, but in my opinion, it is acceptable to believe that people learn more from sharing other people's views rather than facing contradictive opinion owning to three reasons.
The first reason is that in the learning process the acceptance is a critical element to assist us to learn the facts. In other words, the early stage of learning development is agreement or acceptance. This subject conducts us in the direction toward having comfort feeling without having anxious and uneasy with the facts to learn. For example, if we don’t agree with an issue we cannot trust it, therefore a strong resistance commences against this matter and creates a reluctance to avoid the learning. On the other hand, the acceptable subject puts together a snug atmosphere for us to follow it. Take the case, imagine in your neighborhood there is a noisy and rude neighbor who is annoying you, therefore you don’t admire his or her manners and never accept his or her view to learn from her or him.
Another reason is that by sharing a belief we would able to repeat the subject many times. Repeating is one of the effective keys to learning better. Take a case, when we read a novel we face numerous characteristics and plentiful opinion, if we share one of view with our friends in abundant times, this creates a circumstance for our brain to repeat it more and more to support our learning process. The factor of the repetition intensifies the ability of the brain to firmly reminder later. Whenever we share people's views it constructs a profound predisposition to improve learning ability and then we able to simulate people's manners or views.
Further, sharing people's opinions not only, effects gradually on our unconscious mind and it strongly will be fixed in the future without forgetting, but also emerges in our behavior. When we do act in the same figure as other people, it shows obviously that we learn that. The more sharing of people’s opinion the more performing in the same form. This is the final element that indicates we gather practically people’s behavior or their view. Many Researchers of psychology domains state that if individuals like people manners they try to act in the same procedure and it brings a good feeling for them to motivate learn more from them.
Summarize, the learning process is complicated but there some factors that help us to learn easier. We can usually learn extremely from people whose view we share than people's views contradict our own owning three elements: accepting, repeating, and acting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...s one of the effective keys to learning better. Take a case, when we read a novel we f...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, for example, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 33.0505617978 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2520.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00994035785 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69402697532 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491053677932 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9665817744 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9523809524 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.588020529603 0.243740707755 241% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164817287459 0.0831039109588 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178611382309 0.0758088955206 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.373908116318 0.150359130593 249% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177054134015 0.0667264976115 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.