The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Is the question of governing better approached in a top-down or bottom-up direction? Between the radically democratic city-states of the Greek and the depotic empires of the medieval ages, this has been a topic of extensive debate throughout history.
Generally speaking, diversity is a source of creativity and development. When sophisticated scopes like economy or administration are approached, it is normal for some basic dichotomies to arise, according to more or less emphasis on some aspects. In case of economy, for instance, it seems that some will always tend to cast more light on the benefits of liberality and free markets while others emphasize equality and sharing. Such divisions can turn beneficial to the common good if it were left to the people to select the fruits of each vision as appropriate with the circumstances, which certainly require a sense of skepticism.
In this context, the very nature of authority can serve as a mechanism for questioning it. By being confined to limited terms, as seen in modern democracies, for example, political parties make sure that they meet their electors' standrds. Conversely, when positions of power are obtained by means of physical control, as in an absolute monarchy, those who doubt the official narratives would lack the necessary tools to reflect their objections on the welfare of the people.
However, too much questioning can end up being a hindrance of a nation's development. For example, despite the role of labor uprisings in maintaining their civil rights, state-wide revolts can wreak havoc on the economy. In turn, such a debilitated state would be unable to address actual change, even if promised to contain the situation.
In conclusion, while a sense of criticism is vital to the social and political evolution, it should always be exercised with caution, lest it aggravates into a schism that threatens solidarity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | raghavchauhan619 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | KruthiHK | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 66 | view |
- Write about the following topic In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them Sometimes the government has to pay for this care Who do you think should pay for this care th 84
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contained some information about your town that is incorrect Write a letter to the editor of the magazine In your letter correct the information in the article explain why it is impor 66
- Some people think it s better to choose Mends who always have the same opinions as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and inc 84
- Some people say that now is the best time in history to be living What is your opinion about this What other time in history would be interesting to live in Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...oning can end up being a hindrance of a nations development. For example, despite the r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26229508197 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00522522644 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64262295082 0.4932671777 130% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4737321102 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.461538462 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117258117299 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363929893701 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287828875126 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531783956432 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264628710828 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.38706741573 124% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.