When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Planners may believe that demolishing a historic building might be the most profitable way to revitalize a town or city. Individuals who are involved in these decisions need to take into account many different factors. Preservation of historic buildings should be very important to towns both big and small.
Planners may believe that a piece of land could be better suited for redevelopment, but the historical value of a building may be worth significant more to the town and its people. Old buildings were made in way that is not common any more. The intricacies are unprecedented in modern architecture. Buildings that have these attributes should be cherished. In addition, historical building in America are eligible for funding from many sources.
Considering the historical value of a proposed redevelopment project is very important, but modern planners also need to take into account their intended costumer when they are deciding to redevelop historic buildings. Many young professions are drawn to areas with a rustic antique charm. Young millennials who are looking for a place to start their life are drawn to areas that have an old and unique feel. It might be tempting to build a brand new large communities of apartments and shopping, but if the area is too industrial young people may not be as intrigued to live there.
Planners and individuals involved in the decision to redevelop an old building should consider the intended costumer in addition to all options for redevelopment before deciding on a plan of action. There are endless option when it comes to redevelopment for old buildings. If they are a danger to the communities it may be best to demolish the building. In contrast, if the building is in very good condition it would be significantly less wasteful to refurbish the existing building. If the “bones” of the said building are good, but the inside is in disrepair it may be less wasteful keep the outside of the building and upgrade the building inside. Overall it is less wasteful to keep any usable parts of a building. The building planners could decide to build around the existing building if the existing property wasn’t large enough for the intended projects.
Historical buildings should be preserved to maintain its historical charm and history, attract the desired tenants, and reduce waste that can be occurred during construction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | vikey | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | chagens96 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | tanishqjain1002 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Charan H S | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are involved in these decisions need to take into account many different factors...
^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...se decisions need to take into account many different factors. Preservation of historic build...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mes to redevelopment for old buildings. If they are a danger to the communities it...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'in addition', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221445221445 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.188811188811 0.157235817809 120% => OK
Adjectives: 0.111888111888 0.0880659088768 127% => OK
Adverbs: 0.039627039627 0.0497285424764 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.027972027972 0.0444667217837 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0955710955711 0.12292977631 78% => OK
Participles: 0.0512820512821 0.0406280797675 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.99470471938 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.04662004662 0.030933414821 151% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0979020979021 0.0997080785238 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.037296037296 0.0249443105267 150% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.018648018648 0.0148568991511 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2410.0 2732.02544248 88% => OK
No of words: 391.0 452.878318584 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16368286445 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375959079284 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.312020460358 0.280924506359 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.263427109974 0.200843997647 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143222506394 0.132149295362 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99470471938 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473145780051 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 50.530863447 55.4138127331 91% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.55 23.380412469 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3221199874 59.4972553346 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.55 23.380412469 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 50.7520460358 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.43636363636 1.64882698954 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336411119413 0.391690518653 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115757654508 0.123202303941 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.112879918627 0.077325440228 146% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.540942002129 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169185470322 0.149214159877 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133237124165 0.161403998019 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561133433798 0.0892212321368 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.280242449455 0.385218514788 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0718483915639 0.0692045440612 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221458190444 0.275328986314 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513099129947 0.0653680567796 78% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88274336283 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.