When someone achieves greatness in any field such as the arts, science, politics, or business that person’s achievements are more important than any of his or her personal faults.
The measurement of an individual's success in today's world is decided by others based on the achievements in his or her professional life. But, what people may not see is the faults that constitute or provide a larger meaning to our life. Our achievements are just an outward appearance of a person's life which everyone considers important but ignore the importance of our faults through which we learn a lot.
First of all, the greatness of an individual in any field is praiseworthy and should be considered very important because it encourages others to strive for the same. I would like to point out that mistakes in our life whether it is personal or professional life are also of paramount importance because it teaches us more than anything. To illustrate this, let us look at an example related to business. When we start thinking of any business idea, initially, we all have reservations about whether the idea on which we are moving will work or not. We experiment the idea for some time. Based on the results, we determine whether to choose a new business idea or make changes to the existing one. But, the most important thing is learning from our mistakes in the above scenario from which we get to know the right direction.
Furthermore, faults in our personal life in the process of developing our personality plays a crucial role in every aspect of life. Effective communication is very important because it not only helps in conveying messages but also plays a role in establishing our relationship with others in the long run. Both common sense and personal experience have shown us that our personality traits are extremely important when it comes to achieving something in life. A Harvard study review states that life is more fulfilling when our relationship with others is good and thus better relationships happen through continuous introspection of our faults in dealing with others.
Finally, our bad experiences which come from our faults and mistakes teach us good lessons which will help us in our improvement. This is true when it comes to giving interviews for a job. When we fail in an interview, it teaches us more than when we clear an interview. Failing in an interview will help us realize our strengths and weaknesses which makes us well-prepared for the next interview. So, our faults in the past interviews help us know about our capabilities and lackings.
In conclusion, although the achievements of a person are of paramount importance his faults should also be considered but relating achievements with faults is not relevant all the time.
The reason why we should not ignore faults is because of the learnings it gives to others as well as the person. Personal faults and learning from them improve our life in a productive way. So, the faults of a person are equally important as the achievements while determining the overall personality of a person.
- When someone achieves greatness in any field such as the arts science politics or business that person s achievements are more important than any of his or her personal faults 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 55
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
The measurement of an individuals success in todays world is decided by o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...nts are just an outward appearance of a persons life which everyone considers important...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 44, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
... reason why we should not ignore faults is because of the learnings it gives to others as ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 169, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a productive way" with adverb for "productive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and learning from them improve our life in a productive way. So, the faults of a person are equally...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2418.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92464358452 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90825046752 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454175152749 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9726250401 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.130434783 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.347826087 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261609716957 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884172260735 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836106873123 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173268777816 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727990188734 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
The measurement of an individuals success in todays world is decided by o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...nts are just an outward appearance of a persons life which everyone considers important...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 44, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
... reason why we should not ignore faults is because of the learnings it gives to others as ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 169, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a productive way" with adverb for "productive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and learning from them improve our life in a productive way. So, the faults of a person are equally...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2418.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92464358452 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90825046752 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454175152749 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9726250401 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.130434783 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.347826087 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08695652174 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261609716957 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884172260735 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836106873123 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173268777816 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727990188734 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.