Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the

Essay topics:

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

“Accentuating on the positive and eliminating the negative” is my motto of life. It is extremely essential for teachers to exhort students into doing positive tasks and discouraging negative ones. There is a myriad of ways to help students to change their mind-set and have a positive outlook towards life. The following paragraphs will discuss some of them and explain why it is cardinal to use such techniques in pedagogy.

First is by giving them incentives to take steps in the right direction. For instance, rewarding a ten-year old with a lollipop every time he helps another student in trouble, is something that can engender positive thinking amongst children. It creates a healthy environment for everyone and is a clever technique to imbibe students with a sense of gratitude towards their peers. Also, by simply teaching children to say “thank you” and “you’re welcome” can go a long way. It develops their mind to appreciate others’ help and further teaches them good manners.

Furthermore, to instruct students to be warm to a new classmate can be of immense help to boost positive thinking and can play a bigger role in society. The recent refugee crisis in the middle east and Europe has engendered xenophobia and racism amongst the people, who are looking to protect their own interests and are reluctant to help the war stricken refugees, facing dire conditions. It is imperative to purge such emotions from society and teaching to praise positive actions to children since their childhood can play a massive role in altering their views when they grow into adults. However, dismissing all negative actions has its drawbacks as well.

Allowing constructive criticism and honest feedback is important. If negative actions are ignored or looked down upon, no leader or artist will be able to receive a review that is truthful. Additionally, it is important sometimes to depend on methods that are somewhat negative in nature to produce the best in a person. Having said that, the benefits of praising positive actions outweighs the encouragement of negative ones. Hence, the best way to teach is to promote positive thinking.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-30 Abraham04 58 view
2024-06-29 sefeliz 83 view
2024-06-29 sefeliz 83 view
2024-05-09 batterylow_123 30 view
2024-04-11 Theophilus Ebuka Odoh 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user aryamanbanga13 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'praising'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: praising
...such emotions from society and teaching to praise positive actions to children since thei...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, well, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22727272727 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99508356614 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7286683724 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0863644471815 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.025078868047 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0215192553709 0.0758088955206 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0506422874974 0.150359130593 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353826536114 0.0667264976115 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.