Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Some people believe that conservation efforts to protect the environment at the cost of human progress are unnecessary. Others believe that society must preserve the environment regardless of costs or efforts.
Environment measurly consists of all living beings like human beings, animals, plants and non-living things like air, water, etc. Everyone can take small efforts from their side for conserving environment like conserving use of water and reducing use of personal vehicles.
Air is a basic necessity for all living creatures. So, in order to survive, everyone requires clean air to breathe. We have to all the necessary measures to reduce air pollution. Air pollution has very bad effects on health. For example, because of Smog in Delhi, respiratory decease cases are increasing day by day. Hence, whenever possible, public transport should be used for reducing the air pollution. Such small steps can be taken by everyone to conserve the environment.
Secondly, man is cutting down the forests for building new apartment, commercial stores, offices, etc. Because of that many animal and bird species are in danger of extinction. One good example is Tiger. There are very few no. of tigers remaining in the whole world. Also, it is been observed in various metro cities in India that number of sparrows are vastly decreased lately. So, to provide entinction of many such animals, government should keep some area reserved for forests and try to increase no. of sanctuaries, otherwise our next generation will not be able to see these beautiful creatures.
On the other hand, people might think it is waste of money and time to conserve the environment and it is correct in some cases. For example, cleaing of river Ganga. Ganga river is one of the oldest rivers in India and it is used for many holistic work. Central government of India started one campaign to clean this river. But some people are still using river for daily chores and holistic tasks. Because of that people may think that the river will never be cleaned completely and this campaign is waste of money and human efforts.
To conclude, I parrtially agree with the statement 'society must preserve the environment regardless of costs and efforts'. In some cases mentioned above, some efforts should be taken by everyone or the governmwnt or any ruling body in order to preseve the environment and various aspects in it. But, such campaign should not be wasteful and must be managed carefully for being cost efficient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-05 | YACHI PATEL | 66 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | sourkul | 16 | view |
| 2020-08-30 | deeps234@ | 50 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | shantanu35 | 80 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun no seems to be countable; consider using: 'few noes', 'few nos'.
Suggestion: few noes; few nos
...e good example is Tiger. There are very few no. of tigers remaining in the whole world...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'noes', 'nos'?
Suggestion: noes; nos
...od example is Tiger. There are very few no. of tigers remaining in the whole world...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00524934383 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57175528149 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0007785657 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3461538462 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6538461538 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88461538462 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0646972073678 0.243740707755 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0178277697247 0.0831039109588 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0197938367493 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0360434693993 0.150359130593 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129612415576 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun no seems to be countable; consider using: 'few noes', 'few nos'.
Suggestion: few noes; few nos
...e good example is Tiger. There are very few no. of tigers remaining in the whole world...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'noes', 'nos'?
Suggestion: noes; nos
...od example is Tiger. There are very few no. of tigers remaining in the whole world...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00524934383 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57175528149 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0007785657 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.3461538462 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6538461538 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88461538462 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0646972073678 0.243740707755 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0178277697247 0.0831039109588 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0197938367493 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0360434693993 0.150359130593 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129612415576 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.