The information shows the ratio of dissimilar categories of families living in deprivation in Australia in 2000Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.• You should write at least 150 words.• You should spend about 20 minu

Essay topics:

The information shows the ratio of dissimilar categories of families living in deprivation in Australia in 2000
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
• You should write at least 150 words.
• You should spend about 20 minutes on this task

The information shows the ratio of dissimilar categories of families living in deprivation in Australia in 2000

The data presented indicates that one in seven of those family types is argued which all households were in 1,837,000. Then, couple with children type is surveyed in 9,333,000. For the next types, single (no children), sole parent, and couple (no children) are declared by indeterminate averages. Last, the lowest is displayed by single aged person and aged couple with 54,000 and 48,000.

Meanwhile, pie chart concluded that family types with percentage. The biggest parts are seen by sole parent and single (no children) with 21% and 19%. The second places are showed by couple with children and all households that converged percentages 12% and 11%. Eventually, the smallest rates are displayed by single aged person 6% and aged couple 4%.

In 2000, it is figured by both illustrations that the lowest rates are single aged person and age couple.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2013-03-21 Hera Bugis Indina 65 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Hera Bugis Indina :

Comments

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 9
No. of Words: 157 200
No. of Characters: 774 900
No. of Different Words: 84 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.54 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.93 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.642 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 60 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.635 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.2 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.402 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.618 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.072 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4