The pie charts below show the units of electricity production of fuel by source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Given are the charts providing statistical information about the proportion of main fuel sources in production process of electricity, namely; coal, oil, natural gas, hydro power and nuclear power across the two decades in various countries. Overall, the total production of electricity almost doubled in both indicated countries and Australia preferred using coal as the major source whereas France utilized quite various sources in 1980 and preferred nuclear power in 2000.
It is apparent that, in Australia half of total production belonged to coal which experienced a threefold increase during 20 years. Furthermore, the usage of hydro power soared by 16 units while figures for natural gas and oil fell dramatically, to be more precise, from 20 to 2 units and from 10 to 2 units respectively.
In comparison with Australia, France used nuclear power as an additional source and the main share belonged to coal and natural gas which were identical (25 %) and closely followed by oil, nuclear power and hydro power accordingly. Between 1980 and 2000 there were a staggering alteration in distribution of fuel sources, to be more specific, the share of nuclear power was approximately three fourth of total production while figures for oil and coal, and hydro power and natural gas showed the similar indicators.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 68
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 81
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. 65
- Failure is proof that the desire was not strong enough.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 70
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 64
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Some sentences are too long and are not clear to readers.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 6 10
No. of Words: 210 200
No. of Characters: 1079 1000
No. of Different Words: 108 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.807 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.138 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.771 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 76 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 64 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 35 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.326 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.546 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.769 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.169 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4