The table and bar chart show how journey times in a city center changed after improvements were made to the transport network, and the costs of using different forms of transport in the city.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows how long it took to travel around a city before and after transport network was improved. The bar graph shows how much it costs to use different forms of transport in the city.
The cheapest form of transport is the bus, at € 0.40 per kilometer. However, it is also the slowest, even after improvements. Average journey times were 28 minutes before improvements, and 23 minutes after. The tram is slightly more expensive, at € 0.50 per kilometer. However, it is faster than the bus. Average journey times were reduced from 22 to 16 minutes.
The most expensive way of getting around the city is by taxi. However, it remains the fastest form of transport. Even after improvements to the system, a taxi ride only takes about 12 minutes. Car drivers have seen the biggest increase in journey times, from 10 to 15 minutes.
Overall, journey by bus and tram are still slower than by car or taxi, but they are more economical.
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999. 75
- The table below summaries some data collected by a college bookshop for the month of February 2000. Write a report describing the sales figures of various type of publications based on the information shown in the table. You should write at least 150 word 30
- Subjects such as Art Sport and Music are being dropped from the school curriculum for subjects such as Information Technology Many people children suffer as a result of these changes To what extent would you support or reject the idea of moving these subj 70
- IELTS Task 1 : International students in Canadian province -Syerapke- (rewrite) 60
- The report of world population growth (rewrite)) 77
flaws:
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.814 7.5
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 10
No. of Words: 164 200
No. of Characters: 742 1000
No. of Different Words: 91 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.579 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.524 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.359 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 40 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 17 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 3.814 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.308 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.361 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.574 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4